Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 471.9997 (2026)

Federally Assisted Rental Housing; Impact Statement

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

At least 12 months before termination of participation in a federally assisted rental housing program, including project-based Section 8 and Section 236 rental housing, the owner of the federally assisted rental housing must submit a statement regarding the impact of termination on the residents of the rental housing to the governing body of the local government unit in which the housing is located. The impact statement must identify the number of units that will no longer be subject to rent restrictions imposed by the federal program, the estimated rents that will be charged as compared to rents charged under the federal program, and actions the owner will take to assist displaced tenants in obtaining other housing. A copy of the impact statement must be provided to each resident of the affected building, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, and, if the property is located in the metropolitan area as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2, the Metropolitan Council.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2002–2003 · leading case: Forest Park II v. Hadley, 203 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (D. Minnesota 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Forest Park II v. Hadley, 203 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (D. Minnesota 2002). · cites it 10× “MinnStat. § 471.9997 (1998). It is undisputed that Forest Park II has not complied with the notice requirements and the impact statement required by Minnesota law.”

Forest Park II v. Katherine Hadley, 336 F.3d 724 (8th Cir. 2003). “Minn.Stat. Ann. § 471.9997 (West 2001). Essentially, the purpose of these state statutes is to give state agencies and nonprofit organizations enough time to propose alternatives to the owner and to offer the owner financial incentives for maintaining the low-income, federally…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.