Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 486.05 (2026)
District Court; Reporters' Salaries And Expenses
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case: Voight v. Counties of Big Stone, 365 N.W.2d 349 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).
Voight v. Counties of Big Stone, 365 N.W.2d 349 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Although Voight’s salary was paid by the counties, they did so pursuant to statute, see Minn.Stat. § 486.05 (1984), and had no input into the amount he was paid.”
Mary Jean MANGAN, Appellant, v. Donald CULLEN, Appellee, 870 F.2d 1396 (8th Cir. 1989). “Minn.Stat. § 486.05 (1988). In 1982, Mangan’s salary was $28,404 per year.”
Paske v. Cnty. of Dakota, 356 N.W.2d 775 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Although the counties paid employee’s salary, mileage, and traveling and hotel expenses, they were required to do so by § 486.05. They also paid premiums for his group health insurance coverage, furnished him materials used in his work, and furnished the premises where he…”
Kuehn v. State, Dep't of Tenth Jud. Dist., 271 N.W.2d 308 (Minn. 1978). “Moreover, the traditional factors considered in determining whether employee was an employee of the counties clearly permitted the court of appeals to find there was no employment relationship between him and them.”
Inquiry into the Conduct of the Honorable John P. Dehen (Minn. 2025). “Similarly, in this case, there is a statute on court-reporter salaries [ Minn. Stat. § 486.05 , subd. 1 (2024)] and that statute incorporates personnel rules and policies and the collective bargaining agreement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.