Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 501.35 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1989 c 340 art 1 s 77]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1947–2009 · leading case: In Re Instructions to Construe Basic Resolution 876 of the Port Auth. of St. Paul, 772 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. 2009).
In Re Instructions to Construe Basic Resolution 876 of the Port Auth. of St. Paul, 772 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. 2009). “Laws 329 , 329-30 (codified at Minn.Stat. § 501.35 (1976)). In 1977 this section was amended to allow "[a]ny trustee of an express trust by will or other written instrument .”
In re the Trust Created by Hill, 728 F. Supp. 564 (D. Minnesota 1990). “5 The present proceeding was brought pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 501.35 which permits certain parties to initiate proceedings related to the trust.”
In Re Est. & Trust of Anderson, 654 N.W.2d 682 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “Enger’s Will and Warner interpret Minn. Stat. § 501.35 , the predecessor to section 501B.”
In Re Trust B Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Cary, 313 N.W.2d 625 (Minn. 1981). “petition the court then having jurisdiction of the trust as a proceeding in rem, and any trustee of an express trust by will or other written instrument whose appointment has not been confirmed, or any beneficiary of that trust, may petition the district or county court of the…”
In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright, 359 N.W.2d 647 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “It was in accord with Minn.Stat. § 501.35 (1982), which provides: Any trustee of an express trust by will or other written instrument whose appointment has been confirmed, or any beneficiary of that trust, may petition the court then having jurisdiction of the trust as a…”
In Re Trusts Created by Butler Under Written Indenture of Trust Dated June 18, 1920, 26 N.W.2d 204 (Minn. 1947). “1945, § 501.35, 2 the trustee sought the court’s interpretation of certain trust provisions common to all three of the trusts involved herein, namely, with respect to the following paragraphs: “12.”
In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright, 377 N.W.2d 9 (Minn. 1985). “Minn.Stat. § 501.35 (1984). Hence, whether or not there are material purposes yet to be served by continuation of the trust must be determined not only from the trust agreement as amended by the settlor but also as revised by the compromise agreement.”
Matter of Florance, 360 N.W.2d 626 (Minn. 1985). “Moreover, the Court of Appeals felt that the Minnesota courts were "closer" to resolving the litigation and that it would be more advantageous to proceed in Minnesota under the expedited procedures of Minn. Stat. § 501.35 (1982), than under the pending Texas declaratory judgment…”
Matter of Florance, 343 N.W.2d 297 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Minn. Stat. § 501.35 (1982). There are real advantages to proceeding under Section 501.”
Florance v. Mercantile Nat'l Bank at Dallas, 343 N.W.2d 297 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Minn. Stat. § 501.35 (1982). There are real advantages to proceeding under Section 501.”
Hartzell v. Schuster, 100 N.W.2d 513 (Minn. 1959). “08, which states that an appeal may be taken from an order within 30 days after written notice of the same from the adverse party.”
In Re Trust of Warner, 145 N.W.2d 542 (Minn. 1966). “As we have already indicated, the issue here arose in proceedings brought under § 501.35, which permits a trustee to petition the court for instructions in the administration of a trust and for settlement and allowance of its account.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.