Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 518. MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518.41 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1982 c 436 s 37]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1956–2024 · leading case: Kelley v. Opportunity Fin., LLC (In re Petters Co.), 561 B.R. 738 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kelley v. Opportunity Fin., LLC (In re Petters Co.), 561 B.R. 738 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2016). · cites it 4× “31 The creditor’s claim must have allowed the creditor to avoid a transfer under nonbankruptcy law, in this case Minn. Stat. § 518.41 et. seq. 32 (“MUFTA”).”
State of Illinois Ex Rel. Shannon v. Sterling, 80 N.W.2d 13 (Minn. 1956). · cites it 4× “The act, as applied to the relationship of parent and child, was designed for the extension and the better enforcement of the obligations of support (§ 518.41) by enabling two states by reciprocal legislation and joint action to cooperate effectively in compelling a parent…”
Hauser v. Mealey, 263 N.W.2d 803 (Minn. 1978). “The county court shall have concurrent jurisdiction in the following cases: “(a) Proceedings for the administration of trust estates or actions relating thereto; “(b) Proceedings for divorce, annulment, and separate maintenance, and actions related thereto, as prescribed by…”
England v. England, 337 N.W.2d 681 (Minn. 1983). “” The title of the bill enacting the revised URESA in Minnesota was: “An act relating to marriage dissolution; adopting the revised uniform reciprocal enforcement of support act; proposing new law coded as Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 518C, repealing Minnesota Statutes 1980,…”
St. George v. St. George, 304 N.W.2d 640 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “The Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) is codified in Minn. Stat. §§ 518.41 -.53 (1980). The Act is applicable to interstate as well as intrastate cases.”
Stoebner v. Vaughan, 179 B.R. 600 (D. Minnesota 1995). · cites it 2× “On May 31, 1994, Stoebner initiated an adversary proceeding against Vaughan to avoid certain allegedly fraudulent transfers pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 518.41 and 11 U.S.C. §§ 544 , 547 and 548.”
Cnty. of Clearwater, Minn. v. Petrash, 589 P.2d 1370 (Colo. Ct. App. 1979). “1973; Minn.Stat. § 518.41, et seq. We reverse and remand for additional proceedings.”
In re the Marriage of: Emily Lynn Rasmussen v. Nicholas Steven Rasmussen (Minn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “Father argues that the district court erred in determining the appropriateness of the parties’ healthcare coverage for the joint child, as required under Minn. Stat. § 518.41 , subd. 3 (2022). Since the record is insufficient to allow appellate review of the appropriateness of…”
Nicollet Cnty. on Behalf of Block v. Havron, 357 N.W.2d 134 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “All remedies for the enforcement of judgments apply including those available under sections 518.41 to 518.53 and 256.872 to 256.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.