Minn. Stat. § 518.58

Division Of Marital Property

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.General.

Upon a dissolution of a marriage, an annulment, or in a proceeding for disposition of property following a dissolution of marriage by a court which lacked personal jurisdiction over the absent spouse or lacked jurisdiction to dispose of the property and which has since acquired jurisdiction, the court shall make a just and equitable division of the marital property of the parties without regard to marital misconduct, after making findings regarding the division of the property. The court shall base its findings on all relevant factors including the length of the marriage, any prior marriage of a party, the age, health, station, occupation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities, needs, opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets, and income of each party. The court shall also consider the contribution of each in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation or appreciation in the amount or value of the marital property, as well as the contribution of a spouse as a homemaker. It shall be conclusively presumed that each spouse made a substantial contribution to the acquisition of income and property while they were living together as spouses. The court may also award to either spouse the household goods and furniture of the parties, whether or not acquired during the marriage. The court shall value marital assets for purposes of division between the parties as of the day of the initially scheduled prehearing settlement conference, unless a different date is agreed upon by the parties, or unless the court makes specific findings that another date of valuation is fair and equitable. If there is a substantial change in value of an asset between the date of valuation and the final distribution, the court may adjust the valuation of that asset as necessary to effect an equitable distribution.

Subd. 1a.Transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposition of marital assets.

During the pendency of a marriage dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, or in contemplation of commencing a marriage dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, each party owes a fiduciary duty to the other for any profit or loss derived by the party, without the consent of the other, from a transaction or from any use by the party of the marital assets. If the court finds that a party to a marriage, without consent of the other party, has in contemplation of commencing, or during the pendency of, the current dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, transferred, encumbered, concealed, or disposed of marital assets except in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life, the court shall compensate the other party by placing both parties in the same position that they would have been in had the transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposal not occurred. The burden of proof under this subdivision is on the party claiming that the other party transferred, encumbered, concealed, or disposed of marital assets in contemplation of commencing or during the pendency of the current dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, without consent of the claiming party, and that the transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposal was not in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life. In compensating a party under this section, the court, in dividing the marital property, may impute the entire value of an asset and a fair return on the asset to the party who transferred, encumbered, concealed, or disposed of it. Use of a power of attorney, or the absence of a restraining order against the transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposal of marital property is not available as a defense under this subdivision.

Subd. 2.Award of nonmarital property.

If the court finds that either spouse's resources or property, including the spouse's portion of the marital property as defined in section 518.003, subdivision 3b, are so inadequate as to work an unfair hardship, considering all relevant circumstances, the court may, in addition to the marital property, apportion up to one-half of the property otherwise excluded under section 518.003, subdivision 3b, clauses (a) to (d), to prevent the unfair hardship. If the court apportions property other than marital property, it shall make findings in support of the apportionment. The findings shall be based on all relevant factors including the length of the marriage, any prior marriage of a party, the age, health, station, occupation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities, needs, and opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets and income of each party.

Subd. 3.Sale or distribution while proceeding pending.

(a) If the court finds that it is necessary to preserve the marital assets of the parties, the court may order the sale of the homestead of the parties or the sale of other marital assets, as the individual circumstances may require, during the pendency of a proceeding for a dissolution of marriage or an annulment. If the court orders a sale, it may further provide for the disposition of the funds received from the sale during the pendency of the proceeding.

(b) The court may order a partial distribution of marital assets during the pendency of a proceeding for a dissolution of marriage or an annulment for good cause shown or upon the request of both parties, provided that the court shall fully protect the interests of the other party.

Subd. 4.Pension plans.

(a) The division of marital property that represents pension plan benefits or rights in the form of future pension plan payments:

(1) is payable only to the extent of the amount of the pension plan benefit payable under the terms of the plan;

(2) is not payable for a period that exceeds the time that pension plan benefits are payable to the pension plan benefit recipient;

(3) is not payable in a lump-sum amount from defined benefit pension plan assets attributable in any fashion to a spouse with the status of an active member, deferred retiree, or benefit recipient of a pension plan;

(4) if the former spouse to whom the payments are to be made dies prior to the end of the specified payment period with the right to any remaining payments accruing to an estate or to more than one survivor, is payable only to a trustee on behalf of the estate or the group of survivors for subsequent apportionment by the trustee; and

(5) in the case of defined benefit public pension plan benefits or rights, may not commence until the public plan member submits a valid application for a public pension plan benefit and the benefit becomes payable.

(b) The individual retirement account plans established under chapter 354B may provide in its plan document, if published and made generally available, for an alternative marital property division or distribution of individual retirement account plan assets. If an alternative division or distribution procedure is provided, it applies in place of paragraph (a), clause (5).

(c) If liquid or readily liquidated marital property other than property representing vested pension benefits or rights is available, the court, so far as possible, shall divide the property representing vested pension benefits or rights by the disposition of an equivalent amount of the liquid or readily liquidated property.

(d) If sufficient liquid or readily liquidated marital property other than property representing vested pension benefits or rights is not available, the court may order the revocation of the designation of an optional annuity beneficiary in pension plans specified in section 356.48 or in any other pension plan in which plan-governing law or governing documents allow revocation of an optional annuity in marital dissolution or annulment situations.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 303 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1954–2026 · leading case: Lee v. Lee
Lee v. Lee (2009) minn · cites it 32× “In this case, the word "future" limits the potential sources for maintenance to income or earnings received after the marriage has been dissolved (or, more precisely, after the date of valuation, see Minn.Stat. § 518.58, subd. 1 (2008)). The crux of the interpretive dispute is…”
Gill v. Gill (2018) minn · cites it 30× “See Minn. Stat. § 518.58 , subd. 1 (2016) (providing that "[t]he court shall value marital assets for purposes of division between the parties as of the day of the initially scheduled prehearing settlement conference").”
Marriage of Sirek v. Sirek (2005) minnctapp · cites it 23× “The district court found that appellant disposed of marital assets when he did not contest the cancellation of a contract for deed on the property and imputed the value of the property to appellant under Minn.Stat. § 518.58, subd. la (2002). Because it was an abuse of discretion…”
Marriage of Nardini v. Nardini (1987) minn · cites it 10× “Minn.Stat. § 518.58 (1986) provides that-when a marriage is dissolved, “the court shall make a just and equitable division of the marital property of the parties.”
Marriage of Baker v. Baker (2007) minnctapp · cites it 32× “Accordingly, this increase constitutes active appreciation that is marital property subject to just and equitable division under Minn.Stat. § 518.58, subd. 1 (2006). [5] Because the district court erroneously concluded that the value of the appreciation of husband's premarital…”
Marriage of Angell v. Angell (2010) minn · cites it 22× “The court then determined that appellant was entitled to $100,000 from respondent’s nonmarital assets to prevent an unfair hardship, as authorized by Minn.Stat. § 518.58, subd. 2 (2008). 2 Appellant’s total award therefore was $150,000.”
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer (2017) minnctapp · cites it 23× “Those factors include “the length of the marriage, any prior marriage of a party, the age, health, station, occupation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities, needs, opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets, and income of…”
Alam v. Chowdhury (2009) minnctapp · cites it 20× “Minn.Stat. § 518.58, subd. 1 (2008). Here, the district court found that a 2001 valuation date would create inequities in the distribution of the parties' assets because the parties continued to live together after the dissolution of their marriage in 2001, which, according to…”
Marriage of Baker v. Baker (2008) minn · cites it 8× “The court of appeals determined that the husband violated Minn.Stat. § 518.58, subd. la (2006), which bars the parties from using marital assets “except in the usual course of busi *647 ness or for the necessities of life” during the pendency of dissolution proceedings.”
Justis v. Justis (1986) minnctapp · cites it 16× “Minn.Stat. § 518.58 (1984) governs the trial court's division of marital property.”
Marriage of Taylor v. Taylor (1983) minn · cites it 8× “yable upon his retirement; determined that Russell and Rita have joint custody of their minor child, with Rita receiving physical custody subject to liberal visitation rights by Russell; awarded Rita $400 per month child support; ordered that three whole-life insurance policies…”
Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette Nelson (2015) minn · cites it 35× “The question presented in this case is whether appellant Kimberlee Nelson (“Kimberlee”) is entitled to the proceeds of a term life insurance policy on her husband under Minn.Stat. § 518.58, subd. la (2014). Prior to his death and after consulting a lawyer about divorcing…”
— Minn. Stat. § 518.58(1) — 2 cases
Sparks v. Sparks (1992) mich
Polacheck v. Polacheck (2013) ohioctapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.