Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518A.07 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 74 art 3 s 18]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1985–1993 · leading case: In Re the Marriage of Schmidt, 436 N.W.2d 99 (Minn. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re the Marriage of Schmidt, 436 N.W.2d 99 (Minn. 1989). · cites it 12× “at 283-34, codified at Minn.Stat. § 518A.07 (1988). Most germane to that decision, of course, is the “best interest of the child” analysis outlined in UCCJA, § 7(c), 9 U.”

Marriage of Nazar v. Nazar, 505 N.W.2d 628 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 518A.07, subd. 3 (1992). Generally, under the UCCJA, the state which issued the decree (the “decree —state”) will maintain jurisdiction so long as the state remains the residence of the child or a parent or any contestant of the custody proceeding.”

Marriage of Levinson v. Levinson, 389 N.W.2d 761 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “The trial court declined jurisdiction under the UCCJA on the theory of inconvenient forum pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 518A.07, subd. 1 (1984) which provides: A court which has jurisdiction under sections 518A.”

Marriage of Sawle v. Nicholson, 408 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “The trial court's findings on Nicholson's claim that the Minnesota forum is inconvenient pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 518A.07 are similarly within the trial court's proper discretion.”

Marriage of Beier v. Beier, 371 N.W.2d 52 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 518A.07, subd. 1 (1984) provides: A court which has jurisdiction under sections 518A.”

Johnson v. Johnson, 477 N.W.2d 603 (S.D. 1991). · cites it 2× “The "inconvenient forum" section of the UCCJA (SDCL 26-5A-7 and Minn.Stat. 518A.07), states, in pertinent part: A court which has jurisdiction under this chapter to make an initial or modification decree may decline to exercise its jurisdiction any time before making a decree if…”

Marriage of Coleman v. Coleman, 493 N.W.2d 133 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 518A.07, subd. 1 (1990) (court may decline to exercise jurisdiction if another state is more appropriate forum); see also Sawle v.”

Klumpner v. Klumpner, 537 N.E.2d 914 (Ill. App. Ct. 1989). · cites it 2× “2108; Minn. Stat. Ann. §518A.07 (West Supp. 1989).”

— Minn. Stat. § 518A.07(3)(e) — 1 case

Klumpner v. Klumpner, 537 N.E.2d 914 (Ill. App. Ct. 1989). “2108; Minn. Stat. Ann. §518A.07 (West Supp. 1989).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.