Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 518C. UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518C.603 (2026)

Effect Of Registration For Enforcement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A support order or income-withholding order issued in another state or a foreign support order is registered when the order is filed in the registering tribunal of this state.

(b) A registered support order issued in another state or a foreign country is enforceable in the same manner and is subject to the same procedures as an order issued by a tribunal of this state.

(c) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a tribunal of this state shall recognize and enforce, but may not modify, a registered support order if the issuing tribunal had jurisdiction.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2016 · leading case: Rivera v. Ramsey Cnty., 615 N.W.2d 854 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rivera v. Ramsey Cnty., 615 N.W.2d 854 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “But Minn.Stat. § 518C.603(c) provides that [e]xcept as otherwise provided in this chapter [518C], a tribunal of this state 1 shall recognize and enforce, but may not modify, a registered [support or income-withholding] order if the issuing tribunal had jurisdiction.”
In re the Marriage of: Heidi B. Moon v. Roderick H. Moon (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 5× “” Minn. Stat. 518C.603(b) (2014). In this case, the district court was not modifying the order from the Massachusetts court but rather interpreting an ambiguous provision in the order and enforcing it.”
— Minn. Stat. § 518C.603(b) — 1 case
In re the Marriage of: Heidi B. Moon v. Roderick H. Moon (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “” Minn. Stat. 518C.603(b) (2014). In this case, the district court was not modifying the order from the Massachusetts court but rather interpreting an ambiguous provision in the order and enforcing it.”
— Minn. Stat. § 518C.603(c) — 2 cases
Rivera v. Ramsey Cnty., 615 N.W.2d 854 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). “But Minn.Stat. § 518C.603(c) provides that [e]xcept as otherwise provided in this chapter [518C], a tribunal of this state 1 shall recognize and enforce, but may not modify, a registered [support or income-withholding] order if the issuing tribunal had jurisdiction.”
In re the Marriage of: Heidi B. Moon v. Roderick H. Moon (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “” Minn. Stat. 518C.603(b) (2014). In this case, the district court was not modifying the order from the Massachusetts court but rather interpreting an ambiguous provision in the order and enforcing it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.