Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 525. PROBATE PROCEEDINGS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 525.145 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1994 [Repealed, 1995 c 130 s 21]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases, 1946–1999 · leading case: Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. Jewison, 413 N.W.2d 114 (Minn. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. Jewison, 413 N.W.2d 114 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 10× “Minn.Stat. § 525.145, subd. 3 (1984). The homestead is exempt from the claims of most creditors with only limited exceptions.”
Ann H. O'Hagan v. United States, 86 F.3d 776 (8th Cir. 1996). · cites it 4× “O’Hagan, see Minn.Stat. § 525.145 (1996 Supp.); but as discussed below, Mr.”
In Re the Est. of Van Den Boom, 590 N.W.2d 350 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “Both parties recognize the applicability of Minn.Stat. § 525.145 (1992), which was in effect at the time of decedent’s death.”
In Re Est. of O'Keefe, 354 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 5× “DISCUSSION We hold that the trial court properly applied Minn.Stat. § 525.145(3) (1982) in granting Hennepin County’s claim for the value of medical assistance benefits provided in the amount of $58,445.”
In re Est. of Mathews, 558 N.W.2d 263 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 8× “” The legislature has decided both that homesteads are exempt property, see Minn.Stat. § 525.145, and that there are exceptions to that exemption, see Minn.”
Cleys v. Cleys, 363 N.W.2d 65 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 3× “Florian argues first that § 525.145 did not contain a definition of homestead until 1981, when the legislature added the provision for manufactured homes, which are “family residence[s].”
Bigelow v. Halloran, 313 N.W.2d 10 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 525.145 (1980). In addition, any delay in probate proceedings caused by an intentional tort suit is no different from delays resulting from negligence, strict liability, or contract actions, all of which survive the death of a party.”
Jeanine M. BOYD, F/K/A Jeanine Boyd Robinson, Appellant, v. Bruce G. ROBINSON, Appellee, 741 F.2d 1112 (8th Cir. 1984). “Further, under Minn.Stat. Ann. § 525.145 (West Supp.1984), Robinson had an inchoate property interest in the homestead (like what we used to call curte-sy) which would have vested upon Boyd’s death during the marriage.”
In Re Est. of Edhlund, 444 N.W.2d 861 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 6× “In 1982, Minn.Stat. § 525.145(3) was amended to remove the homestead exemption, thus allowing counties to file medical assistance estate claims under Minn.”
In Re Est. of Ablan, 591 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “Further, the legislature reenacted section 524.2-402 in both 1994 and in 1997, subsequent to the adoption of Minn.”
Am. Com. Ins. Brokers, Inc. v. Minnesota Mut. Fire & Cas. Co., 535 N.W.2d 365 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 525.145 (1994). Goods are said to be related for trademark purposes if “used in conjunction with one another” or “associated together in some way in the minds of the consuming public.”
Larsen v. Erickson, 24 N.W.2d 711 (Minn. 1946). · cites it 2× “1945, § 525.145(1), 3 provides: “Where there is a surviving spouse the homestead shall descend free from any testamentary or other disposition thereof to which such spouse has not consented in writing or by election to take under the will as provided by law, * * Section 525.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 525.145(1) — 3 cases
Larsen v. Erickson, 24 N.W.2d 711 (Minn. 1946). “1945, § 525.145(1), 3 provides: “Where there is a surviving spouse the homestead shall descend free from any testamentary or other disposition thereof to which such spouse has not consented in writing or by election to take under the will as provided by law, * * Section 525.”
Hendrickson v. Minneapolis Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 161 N.W.2d 688 (Minn. 1968).
Hendrickson v. Minneapolis Fed. Sav. & L. Ass'n, 161 N.W.2d 688 (Minn. 1968).
— Minn. Stat. § 525.145(1)(b) — 1 case
Cleys v. Cleys, 363 N.W.2d 65 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Florian argues first that § 525.145 did not contain a definition of homestead until 1981, when the legislature added the provision for manufactured homes, which are “family residence[s].”
— Minn. Stat. § 525.145(2) — 1 case
Shields v. Miera (In Re Miera), 104 B.R. 989 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1989).
— Minn. Stat. § 525.145(3) — 6 cases
Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. Jewison, 413 N.W.2d 114 (Minn. 1987). “Minn.Stat. § 525.145, subd. 3 (1984). The homestead is exempt from the claims of most creditors with only limited exceptions.”
In Re Est. of O'Keefe, 354 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “DISCUSSION We hold that the trial court properly applied Minn.Stat. § 525.145(3) (1982) in granting Hennepin County’s claim for the value of medical assistance benefits provided in the amount of $58,445.”
In re Est. of Mathews, 558 N.W.2d 263 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “” The legislature has decided both that homesteads are exempt property, see Minn.Stat. § 525.145, and that there are exceptions to that exemption, see Minn.”
In Re Est. of Edhlund, 444 N.W.2d 861 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “In 1982, Minn.Stat. § 525.145(3) was amended to remove the homestead exemption, thus allowing counties to file medical assistance estate claims under Minn.”
In Re the Est. of Van Den Boom, 590 N.W.2d 350 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). “Both parties recognize the applicability of Minn.Stat. § 525.145 (1992), which was in effect at the time of decedent’s death.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.