Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 525.712 (2026)

Requisites

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The appeal may be taken under the Rules of Appellate Procedure by any person aggrieved after service by any party of written notice of the filing of the order, judgment, or decree appealed from, or if no written notice is served, within six months after the filing of the order, judgment, or decree. Except as provided in this section, the appeal shall be perfected and determined upon the record as provided in the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1942–2024 · leading case: In Re the Guardianship of Autio, 747 N.W.2d 600 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008).
In Re the Guardianship of Autio, 747 N.W.2d 600 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 8× “6, refers to an appeal period inconsistent with the time period established by Minn.Stat. § 525.712 and Minn. R. Civ.App.”
Mold v. Iofredo, 63 N.W.2d 19 (Minn. 1954). · cites it 7× “1949, § 525.712, 2 was that prescribed by M. S.”
In Re Est. of Janda, 353 N.W.2d 211 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 15× “The requisites of the appeal are set out in Minn.Stat. § 525.712 (1982) which provides: The appeal may be taken by any person aggrieved within 30 days after service of notice of the filing of the order, judgment, or decree appealed from, or if no notice be served, within six…”
In Re Est. of Overton, 417 N.W.2d 653 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “However, a special term panel concluded Tani was “aggrieved” as defined by Minn.Stat. § 525.712 (198.6). The charities offered to restore Tani’s bequest and moved again to dismiss his appeal.”
In Re the Est. of Riggle, 654 N.W.2d 710 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “6 (2002) and Minn.Stat. § 525.712 (2002). We affirm. FACTS Decedent David Riggle died intestate in February 2001 as a result of injuries suffered in a one-vehicle accident.”
In Re Est. of Schroeder, 441 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “(b) In addition, the respondents argue that First Bank possesses no right to appeal since it is not an “aggrieved person.”
Matter of Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust, Etc., 305 N.W.2d 755 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “The trial court, however, refused to receive any evidence of the bank's performance as executor from 1973 to 1975 because this was a probate, not a trust, matter.”
Purdy v. Nordquist, 95 N.W.2d 91 (Minn. 1959). · cites it 2× “Williams because she is not related to her and thus has no interest in her guardianships or her estate; that she has no direct interest in Sterling Williams or his estate during his lifetime because a living person has no heirs; that she is not an aggrieved party within the…”
In Re Est. & Guardianships of Williams, 254 Minn. 272 (Minn. 1959). · cites it 2× “Williams because she is not related to her and thus has no interest in her guardianships or her estate; that she has no direct interest in Sterling Williams or his estate during his lifetime because a living person has no heirs; that she is not an aggrieved party within the…”
In Re Est. of Truhn, 394 N.W.2d 864 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Is the appeal timely? 2. Did the trial court err in approving the stipulation? ANALYSIS 1.”
Nationwide Corp. v. Nw. Nat'l Life Ins., 87 N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 1958). “1949, § 525.712] was amended by L. 1953, c. 476, but the rule still applies to other statutes containing the same or similar provisions to that construed in the above case.”
In Re Est. of Langer, 7 N.W.2d 359 (Minn. 1942). · cites it 6× “1941, § 525.712 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 8992-166), provides that an appeal may be taken from an order of the probate court— “by any person aggrieved within thirty days after service of notice of the filing of the order, judgment, or decree appealed from, or if no such notice be…”
— Minn. Stat. § 525.712(1) — 2 cases
In Re Est. of Kucera, 186 N.W.2d 538 (Minn. 1971).
State, Dep't of Pub. Welfare v. Urban, 186 N.W.2d 538 (Minn. 1971).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.