§
Subdivision 1.Six-year limitation.
Except where the Uniform Commercial Code otherwise prescribes, the following actions shall be commenced within six years:
(1) upon a contract or other obligation, express or implied, as to which no other limitation is expressly prescribed;
(2) upon a liability created by statute, other than those arising upon a penalty or forfeiture or where a shorter period is provided by section 541.07;
(3) for a trespass upon real estate;
(4) for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, including actions for the specific recovery thereof;
(5) for criminal conversation, or for any other injury to the person or rights of another, not arising on contract, and not hereinafter enumerated;
(6) for relief on the ground of fraud, in which case the cause of action shall not be deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud;
(7) against sureties upon the official bond of any public officer, whether of the state or of any county, town, school district, or a municipality therein; in which case the limitation shall not begin to run until the term of such officer for which the bond was given shall have expired;
(8) for damages caused by a dam, used for commercial purposes; or
(9) for assault, battery, false imprisonment, or other tort resulting in personal injury, if the conduct that gives rise to the cause of action also constitutes domestic abuse as defined in section 518B.01.
§
Subd. 2.Strict liability.
Unless otherwise provided by law, any action based on the strict liability of the defendant and arising from the manufacture, sale, use or consumption of a product shall be commenced within four years.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
484
cases (
46 in the last 5 years), 1942–2026 · leading case:
Finn v. All. Bank, 838 N.W.2d 585 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013).
Finn v. All. Bank, 838 N.W.2d 585 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 46× “Actual-fraud claims under the MUF-TA are governed by the statute of limitations in Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(6); constructive-fraud claims under the MUFTA are governed by the statute of limitations in Minn.”
Finn v. All. Bank, 860 N.W.2d 638 (Minn. 2015).
· cites it 14× “The second question is whether the statute of limitations governing claims “for relief on the ground of fraud,” Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(6) (2014), or the one governing claims “upon a liability created by statute,” Minn.”
Davies v. West Publ'g Co., 622 N.W.2d 836 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 18× “Does the continuing violation doctrine toll or extend the six-year statute of limitations of Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(1) (2000), for a claim for breach of fiduciary duty alleging improper distributions made over a 30-year period? 4.”
Toombs v. Daniels, 361 N.W.2d 801 (Minn. 1985).
· cites it 16× “The statute of limitations applicable to this action is Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1, sections (6) or (7), as follows: Except where the uniform commercial code otherwise prescribes, the following actions shall be commenced within six years: * * * * * * (6) For relief on the…”
D.M.S. v. Barber, 645 N.W.2d 383 (Minn. 2002).
· cites it 16× “Generally, personal injury actions grounded on negligence must be commenced within the six-year period of limitation provided in Minn. Stat. § 541.05 (5) (2000). Am. Mut.”
In re Petters Co., Inc., 495 B.R. 887 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2013).
· cites it 11× “§ 544 (b) and Minn.Stat. § 541.05, Subd. 1(6): Identification of the Predicate Creditor and Basis for Discovery Allowance.”
Sipe v. STS Mfg., Inc., 834 N.W.2d 683 (Minn. 2013).
· cites it 11× “10, is governed by the six-year statute of limitations set forth in Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(2) (2012), we reverse and remand.”
In re Petters Co., 494 B.R. 413 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2013).
· cites it 14× “Minn.Stat. § 541.05, Subd. 1(2) Versus Minn.”
Johnson v. Steele-Waseca Coop. Elec., 469 N.W.2d 517 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 20× “II Appellants argue, and we agree, that Minn.Stat. § 541.05 (1988), the general statute of limitations, should be applied to their common law tort claims.”
Christiansen v. Univ. of Minnesota Bd. of Regents, 733 N.W.2d 156 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 24× “The district court denied his motion on the ground that the six-year limitation prescribed by Minn. Stat. § 541.05 (2004) governs actions brought under Minn.”
— Minn. Stat. § 541.05(1) — 20 cases
— Minn. Stat. § 541.05(1)(6) — 1 case
— Minn. Stat. § 541.05(2) — 9 cases
— Minn. Stat. § 541.05(3) — 1 case
— Minn. Stat. § 541.05(4) — 1 case
— Minn. Stat. § 541.05(5) — 5 cases
D.M.S. v. Barber, 645 N.W.2d 383 (Minn. 2002).
“Generally, personal injury actions grounded on negligence must be commenced within the six-year period of limitation provided in Minn. Stat. § 541.05 (5) (2000). Am. Mut.”
— Minn. Stat. § 541.05(6) — 12 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.