Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 548.28 (2026)

Notice Of Filing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Affidavit.

At the time of the filing of the foreign judgment, the judgment creditor or the creditor's lawyer shall make and file with the court administrator an affidavit setting forth the name and last known post office address of the judgment debtor, and the judgment creditor.

Subd. 2.Mailing of notice.

Promptly upon the filing of the foreign judgment and the affidavit, the court administrator shall mail notice of the filing of the foreign judgment to the judgment debtor at the address given and shall make a note of the mailing in the docket. The notice shall include the name and post office address of the judgment creditor and the judgment creditor's lawyer, if any, in this state. In addition, the judgment creditor may mail a notice of the filing of the judgment to the judgment debtor and may file proof of mailing with the court administrator. Failure of the court administrator to mail notice of filing shall not affect the enforcement proceedings if proof of mailing by the judgment creditor has been filed.

Subd. 3.Suspension of other process.

No execution or other process for enforcement of a foreign judgment filed hereunder shall issue until 20 days after the date the judgment is filed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1981–2007 · leading case: State Inc. v. Sumpter & Williams, 553 N.W.2d 719 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996).
State Inc. v. Sumpter & Williams, 553 N.W.2d 719 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 10× “Minn.Stat. § 548.28 (1994). Sumpter argues that the errors in the docketing of the federal judgment render that judgment void.”
Matson v. Matson, 310 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “Notice of the filing of the judgment was mailed to defendant pursuant to section 548.28. Defendant then moved for a stay of execution of the judgment pending determination of the jurisdictional issues.”
Voluntary Dissolution of Quintar, Inc. v. MBC, Inc., 397 N.W.2d 594 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 548.28, subd. 3 (1984). On February 12,1986, prior to the expiration of the waiting period, Amitad and Quintar filed for voluntary dissolution in Hennepin County.”
Jensen v. Fhima, 731 N.W.2d 876 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). “Respondent argues that appellant was required to support his motion with a personal affidavit because Minn.Stat. 548.28, subd. 1 (2006), provides that “[a]t the time of filing of the foreign judgment, the judgment creditor or the creditor’s lawyer shall make and file with the…”
Irwin Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Speedy Car Wash, Inc., 672 N.W.2d 375 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Zeug also argues that the garnishment is void because the bank did not comply with the UEFJA when it initiated a proceeding prior to the expiration of the twenty-day notice period provided for in the UEFJA, in Minn.Stat. § 548.28 (2002). Because the bank did not proceed under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.