Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 572.21 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2010 [Repealed, 2010 c 264 art 1 s 32]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1973–2015 · leading case: Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich, 640 N.W.2d 601 (Minn. 2002).
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich, 640 N.W.2d 601 (Minn. 2002). “Minn.Stat. § 572.21 (2000). Parties may limit the time within which legal claims may be brought provided there is no statute specifically prohibiting the use of a different limitations period in such a case and the time fixed is not unreasonable.”
Arbitration Between Metro. Airports Comm'n v. Metro. Airports Police Fed'n, 443 N.W.2d 519 (Minn. 1989). “Minn.Stat. § 572.21 (1988). Because the judgment entered by the trial court in this case did none of those things, it appears this judgment should never have been entered by the trial court.”
David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Constr., Inc., 444 N.W.2d 836 (Minn. 1989). “Minn.Stat. § 572.21 (1988) (emphasis added).”
Hedlund v. Citizens Sec. Mut. Ins. Co., 377 N.W.2d 460 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “) Minn.Stat. § 572.21 (1984) governs the award of costs and disbursements incurred in the application for an order confirming, modifying, or correcting an arbitration award: Upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award, judgment or decree shall be…”
Nat'l Indem. Co. v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 348 N.W.2d 748 (Minn. 1984). “The function of the court is clearly defined in section 572.21 where it states: Upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award, judgment or decree shall be entered in conformity therewith and be enforced as any other judgment or decree.”
Vaubel Farms, Inc. v. Shelby Farmers Mut., 679 N.W.2d 407 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “” Minn. Stat. § 572.21 (2002). Vaubel therefore need not bring a separate action to enforce the arbitration on the award, because the parties are bound by the judgment entered.”
Alpine Glass, Inc. v. Illinois Farmers Ins., 643 F.3d 659 (8th Cir. 2011). “See Minn. Stat. § 572.21 (“Upon the granting of an order confirming .”
Murray v. Puls, 690 N.W.2d 337 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “21 (2002) provides: “Upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award, judgment or decree shall be entered in conformity therewith and be enforced as any other judgment or decree.” The plain language of these statutes indicates that an arbitration award…”
Wanschura v. W. Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co., 389 N.W.2d 927 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “” Minn. Stat. § 572.21 (1984). The statute also provides for vacation and modification or correction of an award.”
Arbitration Between Minnesota Teamsters Pub. & Law Enf't Employees Union, Local No. 320 v. Cnty. of Carver, 571 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “See Minn.Stat. § 572.21 (1996) (upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying, or correcting an award, judgment or decree shall be entered in conformity therewith and be enforced as any other judgment or decree).”
Pulju v. Metro. Prop. & Cas., 535 N.W.2d 608 (Minn. 1995). “20 (1994) resulted in the entry of judgment in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 572.21 which provides that upon an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award, “judgment or decree shall be entered in conformity therewith and be enforced as any other judgment and decree.”
Grover-Dimond Assocs., Inc. v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 211 N.W.2d 787 (Minn. 1973). “09 *329 (a), our courts may also order parties to proceed with arbitration, and under § 572.21, an order confirming an award may be enforced as any other judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.