Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 580.03 (2026)
Notice Of Sale; Service On Occupant
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Six weeks' published notice shall be given that such mortgage will be foreclosed by sale of the mortgaged premises or some part thereof, and at least four weeks before the appointed time of sale a copy of such notice shall be served in like manner as a summons in a civil action in the district court upon the person in possession of the mortgaged premises, if the same are actually occupied. If there be a building on such premises used by a church or religious corporation, for its usual meetings, service upon any officer or trustee of such corporation shall be a sufficient service upon it. The notices required by sections 580.041 and 580.042 must be served simultaneously with the notice of foreclosure required by this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. 2014).
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. 2014). “Bank to vacate the sale because of ineffective service of the foreclosure-related documents in violation of Minn. Stat. § 580.03 (2012) and Minn. R. Civ.”
Douglas Drews v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 738 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). “Following a bench trial in a quiet-title action, appellant argues that the district court erred when it ruled that service of the notice of foreclosure sale was properly effectuated under Minn.Stat. § 580.03. Because we conclude that the service requirements of the statute were…”
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Fin., LLC, 884 N.W.2d 601 (Minn. 2016). “required by Minn.Stat. § 580.03 (2014). The district court empaneled an advisory jury to resolve a factual dispute about whether Jaeger had actual notice of the foreclosure sale.”
Johnson v. LaSalle Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 663 F. Supp. 2d 747 (D. Minnesota 2009). “See Minn.Stat. § 580.03 (stating that in a foreclosure by advertisement, “[s]ix weeks published notice shall be given that such mortgage will be foreclosed by sale of the mortgaged premises or some part thereof’).”
Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Kohnen, 494 N.W.2d 44 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). “Paul challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondents, arguing that pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 580.03 (1990), appellant did not need to serve notice of foreclosure upon a tenant who was in possession of the mortgaged premises in order to validly foreclose…”
Badrawi v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc., 718 F.3d 756 (8th Cir. 2013). “Homeowners do not require the same particular type of notice protection since a separate Minnesota statute requires personal service of foreclosure notice to “the person in possession of the mortgaged premises.”
Gallaher v. Titler, 812 N.W.2d 897 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). “The parties dispute the construction of Minn. Stat. § 580.03 , which presents a question of law subject to de novo review.”
Ruiz v. 1st Fid. Loan Servicing, LLC, 829 N.W.2d 53 (Minn. 2013). “§ 580.03. Ruiz then served and filed an affidavit of postponement, which postponed the original foreclosure sale date for five months but reduced the redemption period from six months to five weeks.”
Minneapolis Grand, LLC v. Galt Funding LLC, 791 N.W.2d 549 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). “See Minn.Stat. § 580.03 (2008) (“Six weeks’ published notice shall be given that such mortgage will be foreclosed by sale of the mortgaged premises or some part thereof, and at least four weeks before the appointed time of sale a copy of such notice shall be served in like…”
In Re the Strawberry Commons Apt. Owners Ass'n 1, 356 N.W.2d 401 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “18 are available only to those mortgagors who, unlike the Heglands, are aware of the foreclosure itself, we cannot say that the trial court clearly erred in finding that examiner’s fees alone did not void the sale.”
Gerdin v. Princeton State Bank, 384 N.W.2d 868 (Minn. 1986). “Minn.Stat. § 580.03 (1984) requires only 6 weeks’ published notice and service thereof upon the person in possession of the mortgage premises.”
Arzt v. Bank of Am., N.A., 883 F. Supp. 2d 792 (D. Minnesota 2012). “041 Arzt next alleges that the foreclosure by sale was invalid because she was not served with the requisite notices prior to the sheriffs sale. The foreclosing party must serve notice of the foreclosure sale, foreclosure advice and notice of redemption rights on the occupants…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.