Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 581.06 (2026)
Surplus
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
When the sale is for cash, if, after satisfying the mortgage debt, with costs and expenses, there is a surplus, it shall be brought into court for the benefit of the mortgagor or the person entitled thereto, subject to the order of the court. If such surplus remains in court for three months without being applied for, the judge may direct it to be put out at interest, subject to the order of the court, for the benefit of the persons entitled thereto, to be paid to them upon order of the court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1988–2010 · leading case: First Minnesota Bank v. Overby Dev., Inc., 783 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010).
First Minnesota Bank v. Overby Dev., Inc., 783 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). “Appellant-mortgagee argues that (1) the district court misread this court’s prior opinion and misidentified the law to be applied on remand; (2) under Minn.Stat. § 581.06, respondents-mortgagors are not entitled to any surplus so long as any part of the debt under the loan…”
First Trust Co., Inc. v. Leibman, 445 N.W.2d 547 (Minn. 1989). “Neither does it seem necessary to look for a construction of the statute which "would operate against a forfeiture." Foreclosure of a mortgage does not involve a forfeiture as does termination of a contract for deed pursuant to Minn.”
Joing v. O & P P'ship, 82 B.R. 495 (D. Minnesota 1988). “2d at 326; see Minn.Stat. § 581.06 (1986). The facts of this case clearly illustrate the failure of the bankruptcy court’s favored methodology to protect the debtor’s statutory interest in having the surplus resulting from the sale of the property applied in his favor.”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ford Mall Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 819 F. Supp. 845 (D. Minnesota 1993). “Thereafter he shall pay the overplus, if any, to the persons entitled thereto pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 581.06 and that he execute to the purchaser at said sale a certificate of sale thereof according to law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.