Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 609.16 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1978 c 723 art 1 s 19]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1966–2009 · leading case: State v. Adams, 295 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 1980).
State v. Adams, 295 N.W.2d 527 (Minn. 1980). “Defendant challenges his *530 sentence as a dangerous offender on the ground that Minn.Stat. § 609.16 (1978) is unconstitutionally vague.”
State v. Rourke, 773 N.W.2d 913 (Minn. 2009). “[3] Before our decision in Givens , we considered a defendant's claim that the dangerous offender statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.16 (1978), was unconstitutionally vague because it allegedly permitted the "use of unfettered discretion rendering the statute standardless.”
State v. Rodriguez, 754 N.W.2d 672 (Minn. 2008). “[6] The sentencing proceeding at issue in Adams was an "extended sentence hearing" under Minn.Stat. § 609.16 (1978) (repealed 1978, effective May 1, 1980), which provided for the imposition of an "extended term of imprisonment" for a defendant who had previously been convicted…”
State v. Michaud, 276 N.W.2d 73 (Minn. 1979). “These felony convictions were listed in the notice filed by the county attorney pursuant to § 609.16. Together with the filing of notice the presentence investigation report required by § 609.”
Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554 (1966). “1085 (1954); Minnesota, Minn. Stat. Ann. § 609.16 ; Missouri, Mo.”
State v. Kimmons, 502 N.W.2d 391 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “We note, initially, that Minn.Stat. § 609.16 (1978) (repealed 1978) 1 , an earlier enhancement statute, which required the court to find that “an extended term of imprisonment is required for [the defendant’s] rehabilitation or for the public safety,” has been held…”
Lawrence v. State, 286 N.E.2d 830 (Ind. 1972). “1085 (1954); Minnesota, Minn Stat Ann § 609.16; Missouri, Mo Ann Stat § 556.”
State v. Scott, 304 N.W.2d 296 (Minn. 1981). “This statute and the related section 609.16 were repealed, effective May 1, 1980, by the 1978 legislature.”
State v. Oksanen, 149 N.W.2d 27 (Minn. 1967). “The court at that time made it known to defendant that he came within § 609.16 as one who was “disposed to the commission of criminal acts of violence” and that “an extended term of imprisonment is required for [his] rehabilitation and for the public safety.”
State Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Tahash, 142 N.W.2d 294 (Minn. 1966). “” The new procedure as set forth in § 609.16 (L. 1963, c. 753, § 609.16) provides that the defendant “may” be sentenced to an extended term where the circumstances warrant it and where definite procedural steps are taken, which may be initiated by the prosecuting attorney or by…”
— Minn. Stat. § 609.16(3) — 1 case
State v. Michaud, 276 N.W.2d 73 (Minn. 1979). “These felony convictions were listed in the notice filed by the county attorney pursuant to § 609.16. Together with the filing of notice the presentence investigation report required by § 609.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.