Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 609.32 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1979 c 255 s 9]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1968–1996 · leading case: State v. Kelley, 295 N.W.2d 521 (Minn. 1980).
State v. Kelley, 295 N.W.2d 521 (Minn. 1980). “Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of four prostitution-related offenses: (a) inducing a person under 18 years of age to practice prostitution, Minn. Stat. § 609.32 , subd. 2(1) (1978), (b) keeping a place of prostitution, Minn.”
State v. Sebasky, 547 N.W.2d 93 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). “1(a) (representing a triple upward departure from the presumptive sentence), to 172 months for his first violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.32, subd. 1(g) (representing a 62-month upward departure from the presumptive sentence), and to a consecutive sentence of 86 months for his…”
State v. Bennett, 258 N.W.2d 895 (Minn. 1977). “1976, § 609.32, subd. 1(1). (Italics supplied.) Defendant was charged with and convicted of offering to engage for hire in sexual intercourse (count I) and in sodomy (count II) with Sgt.”
State v. Bellfield, 275 N.W.2d 577 (Minn. 1978). “3(3), and conspiracy to solicit prostitution, §§ 609.32, subd. 3(3), and 609.175, subd.”
State v. Mar, 291 N.W.2d 223 (Minn. 1980). “343(e), (i) (1978) (causing personal injury to complainant while using force or coercion to accomplish sexual contact), and guilty of soliciting or inducing a person over eighteen years of age to practice prostitution, Minn.Stat. § 609.32, subd. 3(3) (1978). The trial court…”
State v. Scott, 304 N.W.2d 296 (Minn. 1981). “§ 609.32 (1978). 1 The trial court sentenced defendant to consecutive prison terms of 20 years and 5 years.”
State v. Mitchell, 172 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1969). “507, which enacted substantially the same provision as § 609.32, subd. 4, part of the Criminal Code.”
State v. Anderson, 159 N.W.2d 892 (Minn. 1968). “609.32, subd. 4(1), inflicts cruel and inhuman punishment contrary to our State and Federal Constitutions, and (2) whether the application of the law as to these defendants is so discriminatory that they ought to be discharged.”
State v. Jones, 249 N.W.2d 893 (Minn. 1977). “One such as defendant who manages a place of prostitution violates § 609.32, subd. 3(1), whereas the prostitutes who work in such a place violate i§ 609.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.