Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 609.346 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1998 c 367 art 6 s 16]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 71
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2024 · leading case: State v. Calmes, 632 N.W.2d 641 (Minn. 2001).
State v. Calmes, 632 N.W.2d 641 (Minn. 2001). “Although Calmes' criminal sexual conduct conviction required that his sentence include a 5-year conditional release term, see Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 5(a) (1996), [1] there is no record of any discussion of a conditional release term as part of the plea negotiations or at…”
State v. Ronquist, 600 N.W.2d 444 (Minn. 1999). “342” contained in Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 2a(a)(2)(iii) (1996).”
State v. Humes, 581 N.W.2d 317 (Minn. 1998). “On March 20, 1997, an administrator of Minnesota Correctional Facility — Stillwater sent the district court a letter inquiring whether it had intended to include a conditional release term in Humes’ sentence in accordance with Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 5 (1996). The court…”
State v. Wukawitz, 662 N.W.2d 517 (Minn. 2003). “Laws 1983 , 2002-04 (codified at Minn.Stat. § 609.346, *523 subd. 5 (1992)).”
State v. Garcia, 582 N.W.2d 879 (Minn. 1998). “We hold that Garcia’s original sentence, which did not contain the conditional release term required by Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 5 (1996), was unauthorized and properly corrected by the district court.”
State v. Spears, 560 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “The state argued Spears was subject to the mandatory minimum term provision of Minn. Stat. § 609.346 , which requires a sentence of life imprisonment for a first-degree criminal sexual conduct conviction of a defendant with two prior sex offenses.”
State v. Robinson, 476 N.W.2d 896 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “Appellant Gary Neil Robinson was convicted of second degree criminal sexual conduct and sentenced to 37 years in prison pursuant to Minn.Stat. 609.346, subd. 2a (Supp.1989).”
State v. Friend, 385 N.W.2d 313 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “l statement made by appellant, prior to a Miranda warning and allegedly while in custody and in response to interrogation; (3) the prosecutor’s comments during closing argument and questions during voir dire examination were improper and entitle him to a new trial; and (4) the…”
James v. State, 699 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 2005). “At the time of James's offense, Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 5(a) (1996), required that any sentence imposed on a defendant convicted of a criminal sexual conduct offense who had a previous criminal sexual conduct conviction include a mandatory 10-year conditional release term.”
State v. Combs, 504 N.W.2d 248 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “1(a) (1990), and his sentence to 37 years’ imprisonment under the repeat sex offender statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 2a (1990). We affirm.”
State v. Bettin, 295 N.W.2d 542 (Minn. 1980). “Specifically, the state requests that we consider "correcting" defendant's sentence by relying on Minn.Stat. § 609.346 (1976) and changing it from an indeterminate term with no minimum to a term with a 3-year minimum because this is defendant's second sexual offense.”
James v. State, 674 N.W.2d 216 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 2 (1996). At the plea hearing, the district court and counsel discussed both whether the mandatory minimum executed term would be waived in James's case and whether James would be allowed to withdraw his plea if he was not accepted into a long-term…”
— Minn. Stat. § 609.346(2) — 1 case
State v. Kornexl, 351 N.W.2d 26 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
— Minn. Stat. § 609.346(c) — 1 case
In re the Welfare of D.L.K., 362 N.W.2d 13 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.