Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 609. CRIMINAL CODE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 609.3461 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 609.117]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1989–2017 · leading case: Johnson v. State, 673 N.W.2d 144 (Minn. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johnson v. State, 673 N.W.2d 144 (Minn. 2004). · cites it 12× “Because Johnson I interpreted the operative language of Minn. Stat. § 609.3461 , it implicitly decided that the requirement of that section, that Johnson be convicted of a crime “arising out of the same set of circumstances” as criminal sexual conduct, was not met.”
Kruger v. Erickson, 875 F. Supp. 583 (D. Minnesota 1995). · cites it 16× “Prison officials had ordered petitioner to provide them with a blood sample for DNA analysis as required by Minn. Stat. § 609.3461 . [3] Petitioner argued that taking his blood violated his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and cruel and unusual punishment.”
State v. Johnson, 813 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2012). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 609.3461, subd. 1 (1992). . Act of May 20, 1993, ch.”
Johnson v. State, 654 N.W.2d 126 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 16× “1(a)(1)(iii) (1996) (requiring registration as predatory offender if convicted of an enumerated offense or if the conviction arose out of the same set of circumstances) with Minn.Stat. § 609.3461, subd. 1(1) (1996) (requiring offenders convicted under section 609.”
In re the Welfare of M.L.M., 813 N.W.2d 26 (Minn. 2012). · cites it 6× “In both situations, the government collects a biological specimen that is used by a restricted number of persons for a limited and legitimate governmental interest.”
In Re the Welfare of Z.P.B., 474 N.W.2d 651 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 14× “This is an appeal from an order of the juvenile court directing appellant to submit a biological specimen for DNA analysis under Minn.Stat. § 609.3461 (1990). FACTS Appellant, Z.”
State v. Schwartz, 447 N.W.2d 422 (Minn. 1989). · cites it 2× “§ 609.3461 (requiring DNA testing of sex offenders) and id.”
Inmate 115235, C.A. Kruger v. Robert Erickson, 77 F.3d 1071 (8th Cir. 1996). “See Minn.Stat. § 609.3461. Over his objection, prison officials took Kruger’s blood sample for DNA analysis.”
Denault v. State, 2017 ND 167 (N.D. 2017). “I [¶ 2] In 2000, Denault pled guilty in Clay County, Minnesota, to violating Minn. Stat. § 609.3461 , for lewd exhibition, gross misdemeanor criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree.”
In Re the Welfare of M.L.M., 781 N.W.2d 381 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “1991) (holding that DNA collection from a juvenile under Minn.Stat. § 609.3461 (1990), which was renumbered as Minn.”
State v. Jackson, 741 N.W.2d 146 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “2004) (expressly stating that the court is not reaching the question of whether Minn.Stat. § 609.3461, renumbered as Minn.”
Kruger v. Erickson, 875 F. Supp. 583 (D. Minnesota 1995). · cites it 16× “Prison officials had ordered petitioner to provide them with a blood sample for DNA analysis as required by Minn. Stat. § 609.3461 . 3 Petitioner argued that taking his blood violated his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and cruel and unusual punishment.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.