Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 609.910 (2026)

Relation To Other Sanctions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Remedy not exclusive.

Except as provided in this section, a criminal penalty, forfeiture, or fine imposed under section 609.903, 609.904, 609.905, or 609.911 does not preclude the application of any other criminal penalty or civil remedy for the separate criminal acts. A prosecuting authority may not file a civil action under section 609.911 if any prosecuting authority has filed a previous criminal proceeding under section 609.903 against the same person based on the same criminal conduct and the charges were dismissed after jeopardy attached or the person acquitted.

Subd. 2.Restitution.

A restitution payment to a victim under section 609.904 does not limit the liability for damages in a civil action or proceeding for an amount greater than the restitution payment.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1993–2018 · leading case: State v. Trong Kim Huynh, 504 N.W.2d 477 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Trong Kim Huynh, 504 N.W.2d 477 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 20× “Minn.Stat. § 609.910, subd. 1 provides that a criminal penalty imposed under Minnesota's RICO Act "does not preclude the application of any other criminal penalty or civil remedy for the separate criminal acts.”
State v. Longo, 909 N.W.2d 599 (Minn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 8× “" Minn. Stat. § 609.910 , subd. 1. Longo concedes that under section 609.”
State v. Kelly, 504 N.W.2d 513 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 609.910, subd. 1. Given this provision, the trial court properly imposed separate sentences for the prostitution offenses and the racketeering offense.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.