Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 609.910 (2026)
Relation To Other Sanctions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§
Subdivision 1.Remedy not exclusive.
Except as provided in this section, a criminal penalty, forfeiture, or fine imposed under section 609.903, 609.904, 609.905, or 609.911 does not preclude the application of any other criminal penalty or civil remedy for the separate criminal acts. A prosecuting authority may not file a civil action under section 609.911 if any prosecuting authority has filed a previous criminal proceeding under section 609.903 against the same person based on the same criminal conduct and the charges were dismissed after jeopardy attached or the person acquitted.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1993–2018 · leading case: State v. Trong Kim Huynh, 504 N.W.2d 477 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993).
State v. Trong Kim Huynh, 504 N.W.2d 477 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “Minn.Stat. § 609.910, subd. 1 provides that a criminal penalty imposed under Minnesota's RICO Act "does not preclude the application of any other criminal penalty or civil remedy for the separate criminal acts.”
State v. Longo, 909 N.W.2d 599 (Minn. Ct. App. 2018). “" Minn. Stat. § 609.910 , subd. 1. Longo concedes that under section 609.”
State v. Kelly, 504 N.W.2d 513 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “” Minn.Stat. § 609.910, subd. 1. Given this provision, the trial court properly imposed separate sentences for the prostitution offenses and the racketeering offense.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.