Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 628.19 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1979 c 233 s 42]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1955–1987 · leading case: State v. Schifsky, 69 N.W.2d 89 (Minn. 1955).
State v. Schifsky, 69 N.W.2d 89 (Minn. 1955). “Under our decisions, and we believe now under the decisions of this country generally, it has become a fundamental rule of modern appellate procedure that in order to warrant a reversal and the granting of a new trial, both in civil and criminal cases, the error complained of…”
State v. Oman, 121 N.W.2d 616 (Minn. 1963). “§ 628.19. 3 In State v. *280 Mancino, 257 Minn.”
State v. Wickstrom, 405 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “05 provides: The court may permit an indictment or complaint to be amended at any time before a verdict or finding if no additional or different offense is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced. The rule supersedes a statute which applied only to…”
State v. Clark, 134 N.W.2d 857 (Minn. 1965). “” Section 628.19 contains this provision: “No indictment shall be insufficient, nor shall the trial, judgment, or other proceedings thereon be affected, by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the…”
State v. Britt, 156 N.W.2d 261 (Minn. 1968). “” § 628.19 provides: “No indictment shall be insufficient * * * by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant upon the merits.”
State v. Owens, 129 N.W.2d 284 (Minn. 1964). “This rule is expressed by statute, § 628.19, which provides in part as follows: “No indictment shall be insufficient, nor shall the trial, judgment, or other proceedings thereon be affected, by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form which does not tend to the…”
State Ex Rel. Moriarty v. Tahash, 112 N.W.2d 816 (Minn. 1962). “19 provides: “No indictment shall be insufficient, nor shall the trial, judgment, or other proceedings thereon be affected, by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant upon the merits.”
State v. Cunningham, 99 N.W.2d 908 (Minn. 1959). “While it would have been preferable to add, in the language of the statute, that the money was also obtained by means of a “trick or device,” the defendant was, nevertheless, directly charged with a violation of the statute.”
State Ex Rel. McGregor v. Rigg, 109 N.W.2d 310 (Minn. 1961). “The information was filed October 27, 1958, and it is only fair to assume that this was subsequent to the arraignment in accordance with ordinary practice.”
State v. Lehn, 134 N.W.2d 329 (Minn. 1965). “19, which provides in part: “No indictment shall be insufficient, nor shall the trial, judgment, *509 or other proceedings thereon be affected, by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.