Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 645.36 (2026)

Effect Of Repeal Of Repealer

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When a law is repealed which repealed a former law, the former law shall not thereby be revived, unless it is so specifically provided.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2009 · leading case: Granville v. Minneapolis Pub. Schs., Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 732 N.W.2d 201 (Minn. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Granville v. Minneapolis Pub. Schs., Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 732 N.W.2d 201 (Minn. 2007). · cites it 20× “They contend that Minn. Stat. § 645.36 (1996), which states that “[w]hen a law is repealed which repealed a former law, the former law shall not thereby be revived, unless it is so specifically provided,” supports the conclusion that section 466.”

In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Dep't of Com. for Comm'n Action Against AT & T, 759 N.W.2d 242 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “35, there is a clear distinction between repeal and sunset related to this section. AT & T argues that the general saving statute saves repealed laws because of due process concerns that a repeal could impinge on a vested right granted by the original law, a circumstance that…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.