Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 645.42 (2026)
Effect Of Separate Repeals On Code Provisions Enacted At Same Session
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
When a law repeals any provision of a law incorporated into a code adopted at the same session of the legislature, the law repealing the provisions so incorporated into the code shall be construed to effect a repeal of the corresponding provision of the code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1986–1986 · leading case: In Re Wage & Hour Violations of Holly Inn, Inc., 386 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986).
In Re Wage & Hour Violations of Holly Inn, Inc., 386 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “The amicus argues that since an order for compliance issued by the commissioner may only be enforced by court order, the two year statute of limitations would not be tolled until the action to enforce were actually filed in district court.”
— Minn. Stat. § 645.42(2) — 1 case
In Re Wage & Hour Violations of Holly Inn, Inc., 386 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “The amicus argues that since an order for compliance issued by the commissioner may only be enforced by court order, the two year statute of limitations would not be tolled until the action to enforce were actually filed in district court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.