Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 69.77 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2012 [CITY OF BLOOMINGTON; LOCAL.] [2013 c 111 art 5 s 80]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1975–2011 · leading case: City of Crystal Police Relief Ass'n v. City of Crystal, 477 N.W.2d 728 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991).
City of Crystal Police Relief Ass'n v. City of Crystal, 477 N.W.2d 728 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “) 3 Minn.Stat. § 69.77, subd. 2a (1990) fixes the current contribution rate at: not less than eight percent of the maximum rate of salary upon which retirement coverage is credited and service pension and retirement benefit amounts are determined.”
City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'n, 800 N.W.2d 165 (2011). “But the court concluded that the city was not entitled to the equitable remedy of recoupment because there was an adequate remedy at law provided by Minn.Stat. § 69.77, pursuant to which the court ordered the associations to recalculate levy requests from 2000 forward, and to…”
Columbia Heights Police Relief Ass'n v. City of Columbia Heights, 233 N.W.2d 760 (Minn. 1975). “§ 69.77. At oral argument we had the impression that the issue was raised as makeweight, with CHPRA anticipating virtual certainty of repassage and voter approval if their position was upheld.”
Col. Hts. Police Rel. Ass'n v. City of Col. Hts., 233 N.W.2d 760 (Minn. 1975). “[17] § 69.77. [18] At oral argument we had the impression that the issue was raised as makeweight, with CHPRA anticipating virtual certainty of repassage and voter approval if their position was upheld.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.