Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 8. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 8.11 (2026)

Bringing Action To Recover On Bonds

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The attorney general is hereby authorized, with the approval of the governor, to commence any action or proceeding, in the name of the state, to recover upon any bonds or obligations of any other state of the United States which may now or hereafter be held or owned by the state, or any of its boards or departments, and upon any bonds held in any sinking fund or guaranty funds deposited or pledged with the state by trust companies, banks, fidelity or insurance companies, or held by the commissioner of commerce as liquidator.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1964–2008 · leading case: Olson v. Synergistic Tech. Bus. Sys., Inc., 628 N.W.2d 142 (Minn. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Olson v. Synergistic Tech. Bus. Sys., Inc., 628 N.W.2d 142 (Minn. 2001). · cites it 4× “1, 16-17 (1888); Holmes, supra, § 8.11; see also Merex A.G. v. Fairchild Weston Sys.”
Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas, 579 F. Supp. 2d 1210 (D. Minn. 2008). · cites it 2× “, 2-8 Nimmer on Copyright, § 8.11[A] (2008); 4 William F. Patry, Pa-try on Copyright, § 13.”
Silesky ex rel. Silesky v. Kelman, 161 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1968). · cites it 2× “1 Harper and James, Law of Torts, § 8.11, p. 650, advocates allowing the maintenance of an action in tort against a *636 parent or a child in every case "in which it is reasonably clear that the domestic peace has already been disturbed beyond repair or where by reason of the…”
Hart v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 226 F. Supp. 635 (D. Minn. 1964). “See 1 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 8.11, p. 570 (1958). Rule 1.240(c) (1) is hardly a model of clarity, but it is not the tortured creature plaintiffs make it out to be.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.