Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 8.11 (2026)
Bringing Action To Recover On Bonds
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The attorney general is hereby authorized, with the approval of the governor, to commence any action or proceeding, in the name of the state, to recover upon any bonds or obligations of any other state of the United States which may now or hereafter be held or owned by the state, or any of its boards or departments, and upon any bonds held in any sinking fund or guaranty funds deposited or pledged with the state by trust companies, banks, fidelity or insurance companies, or held by the commissioner of commerce as liquidator.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1964–2008 · leading case: Olson v. Synergistic Tech. Bus. Sys., Inc., 628 N.W.2d 142 (Minn. 2001).
Olson v. Synergistic Tech. Bus. Sys., Inc., 628 N.W.2d 142 (Minn. 2001). “1, 16-17 (1888); Holmes, supra, § 8.11; see also Merex A.G. v. Fairchild Weston Sys.”
Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas, 579 F. Supp. 2d 1210 (D. Minnesota 2008). “, 2-8 Nimmer on Copyright, § 8.11[A] (2008); 4 William F. Patry, Pa-try on Copyright, § 13.”
Silesky Ex Rel. Silesky v. Kelman, 161 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1968). “1 Harper and James, Law of Torts, § 8.11, p. 650, advocates allowing the maintenance of an action in tort against a *636 parent or a child in every case "in which it is reasonably clear that the domestic peace has already been disturbed beyond repair or where by reason of the…”
Hart v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 226 F. Supp. 635 (D. Minnesota 1964). “See 1 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 8.11, p. 570 (1958). Rule 1.240(c) (1) is hardly a model of clarity, but it is not the tortured creature plaintiffs make it out to be.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.