Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 8.13 (2026)

Contest Of Barriers On Dairy Products

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The attorney general is authorized to take such action as the attorney general deems necessary in order to contest or oppose existing statutes, ordinances, rules, orders or other trade barriers which may restrict the sale in other states of milk or other dairy products produced in Minnesota; to study and investigate problems concerning the free movement of milk and other dairy products in interstate commerce and to present the results thereof to such legislative and executive agencies of the federal government and the several states, such studies, investigations and presentations to executive and legislative agencies to be made either individually or jointly with others.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1960–2016 · leading case: Kelly v. Opportunity Fin., LLC (In re Petters Co.), 562 B.R. 391 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kelly v. Opportunity Fin., LLC (In re Petters Co.), 562 B.R. 391 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2016). · cites it 6× “Section 8.13 of the Credit Agreement between PC Funding and PCI, attached as Exhibit A to the Complaint, states that Opportunity Finance is the third party beneficiary of the agreement between PC Funding and PCI, and that Opportunity Finance has the authority to assign its…”

State v. Favors, 482 N.W.2d 226 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). “Other remedies, such as the right to due process and the right to a speedy trial, are available to defendants who suffer actual prejudice from a delay in prosecution. In addition, the trial court has power under Minn.”

State of Minnesota Ex Rel. Miles Lord, Attorney Gen. v. Ezra T. Benson, Sec'y of Agric., 274 F.2d 764 (D.C. Cir. 1960). “Minn.Stat.Ann. § 8.13 (Supp.1958). 3 . An examination of the complaint in Bowles, however, shows not only that it attacked the Price Control Act as violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, but also that it attacked certain orders of the Administrator, Bowles,…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.