Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 97.481 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1986 c 386 art 4 s 33]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1973–1980 · leading case: Kasch v. Clearwater Cnty., 289 N.W.2d 148 (Minn. 1980).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kasch v. Clearwater Cnty., 289 N.W.2d 148 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 16× “Plaintiffs, Paul and Carol Kasch, appeal from a judgment of the district court dismissing their action against defendants, the Clearwater County Board of Commissioners, 1 for a writ of mandamus or declaratory judgment requiring the board to act, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 97.481…”

In Re Petition of Schwermann v. Reinhart, 210 N.W.2d 33 (Minn. 1973). “If the state desires to maintain the area in question as a conservation area, it should proceed under the provisions of § 97.481. If not, such considerations cannot interfere with drainage proceedings and cannot be a basis for dismissing a drainage proceeding ordered by the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.