Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 97.50 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1986 c 386 art 4 s 33]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1948–2002 · leading case: State v. Larsen, 650 N.W.2d 144 (Minn. 2002).
State v. Larsen, 650 N.W.2d 144 (Minn. 2002). · cites it 2× “The state argues that longstanding laws regulating angling in Minnesota have alerted anglers for decades that conservation officers are authorized to enter their fish houses without permission or probable cause, citing Minn.Stat. § 97.50, subd. 1(4) (1945) (now found at Minn.”
State v. One Oldsmobile Two-Door Sedan, 35 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1948). · cites it 4× “Section 97.50, subd. 2, provides that any motor vehicle used in violating § 100.”
State v. Suess, 52 N.W.2d 409 (Minn. 1952). · cites it 2× “Section 97.50, subd. 6, provides for the seizure of all motor vehicles, trailers, and airplanes used in violation of § 100.”
State v. Sorenson, 430 N.W.2d 231 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “The Minnesota Supreme Court has ruled that Minn.Stat. § 97.50, subd. 2 (Supp. 1985), the predecessor of Minn.”
State v. Hoagland, 270 N.W.2d 778 (Minn. 1978). “The statute, § 97.50, subd. 2, gives conservation officers the right to go upon private premises to carry out their official duties, and property owners may not resist the lawful exercise of that authority.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.