Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-267 (2026)

Primary election ballot boxes; penalty for failure to deliver ballot boxes

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Derived from 1942 Code § 3126 [Codes, 1906, § 3712; Hemingway's 1917, § 6404; 1930, § 5884; Laws, 1910, ch. 208; repealed, Laws, 1970, ch. 506, § 33, and 1986, ch. 495, § 346]; Laws, 1986, ch. 495, § 82; Laws, 2001, ch. 523, § 4, eff. 6/20/2001 (the date the United States Attorney General interposed no objection under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965).

Amended by Laws, 2017, ch. 441, HB 467, 64, eff. 7/1/2017.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2005 · leading case: Waters v. Gnemi, 907 So. 2d 307 (Miss. 2005).
Waters v. Gnemi, 907 So. 2d 307 (Miss. 2005). · cites it 2× “Thus, pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-267 (3), the HCDEC, not the county election commission, should have taken control of the ballot boxes and delivered them to the circuit clerk.”
Debra Waters v. James Gnemi (Miss. 2003). · cites it 2× “Thus, pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-267 (3), the HCDEC, not the county election commission, should have taken control of the ballot boxes and delivered them 42 to the circuit clerk.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-267(3) — 1 case
Waters v. Gnemi, 907 So. 2d 307 (Miss. 2005). “Thus, pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-267 (3), the HCDEC, not the county election commission, should have taken control of the ballot boxes and delivered them to the circuit clerk.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.