Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 23-17-31 (2026)

Procedure for rejection of measure and adoption of new measure by Legislature; designation of "Alternative Measure No. A"; fiscal analysis

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1993, ch. 514, § 16, eff. 8/3/1993 (the date the United States Attorney General interposed no objections under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965).


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1999–2015 · leading case: Legislature of the State of Mississippi v. Adrian Shipman, 170 So. 3d 1211 (Miss. 2015).
Legislature of the State of Mississippi v. Adrian Shipman, 170 So. 3d 1211 (Miss. 2015). · cites it 25× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 23-17-31 (1) (Rev. 2007).”
In Re Proposed Initiative Measure No. 20, 774 So. 2d 397 (Miss. 2000). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-17-31(2) requires that "[t]he chief legislative budget officer shall prepare a fiscal analysis of each initiative and each legislative alternative.”
Stoner v. Mahoney, 774 So. 2d 397 (Miss. 2000). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-17-31(2) requires that “[t]he chief legislative budget officer shall prepare a fiscal analysis of each initiative and each legislative alternative.”
Elizabeth Stoner v. Robert Mahoney (Miss. 1999). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 23-17-31 (2) requires that "[t]he chief legislative budget officer shall prepare a fiscal analysis of each initiative and each legislative alternative.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 23-17-31(2) — 2 cases
In Re Proposed Initiative Measure No. 20, 774 So. 2d 397 (Miss. 2000). “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-17-31(2) requires that "[t]he chief legislative budget officer shall prepare a fiscal analysis of each initiative and each legislative alternative.”
Stoner v. Mahoney, 774 So. 2d 397 (Miss. 2000). “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-17-31(2) requires that “[t]he chief legislative budget officer shall prepare a fiscal analysis of each initiative and each legislative alternative.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.