Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following terms, when used in this chapter, unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context, shall have the following meanings:

Laws, 1980, ch. 303, § 3; Laws, 1981, ch. 504, § 10; Laws, 1984, ch. 488, § 171; Laws, 1990, ch. 429, § 1; Laws, 1994, ch. 377, § 1; Laws, 1994 Ex Sess, ch. 26, § 18; Laws, 1996, ch. 343, § 1; Laws, 1997, ch. 609, § 4; Laws, 1998, ch. 574, § 5; Laws, 2003, ch. 517, § 1; Laws, 2009, ch. 363, § 1, eff. 7/1/2009.

Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 423, HB 249,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by Laws, 2022, ch. 385, SB 2818,§ 1, eff. 3/30/2022.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 302, HB 69,§ 1, eff. 1/28/2021.

Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 432, SB 2625,§ 3, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by Laws, 2018EX1, ch. 2, SB 2001,§ 48, eff. 9/1/2018.

Amended by Laws, 2014, ch. 397, HB 460, 4, eff. 7/1/2014.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1987–2023 · leading case: Cindy W. King v. Mississippi Military Dep't, 245 So. 3d 404 (Miss. 2018).
Cindy W. King v. Mississippi Military Dep't, 245 So. 3d 404 (Miss. 2018). · cites it 2× “" Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (b) (Rev. 2010).”
McMurtray v. Holladay, 11 F.3d 499 (5th Cir. 1993). · cites it 3× “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-9-107(b), (c). State service employees are afforded the protections of the state personnel system.”
Gill v. Dept. of Wildlife Conservation, 574 So. 2d 586 (Miss. 1990). “" See Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-9-107 (b) and -121 (Supp.”
Buford v. Holladay, 791 F. Supp. 635 (S.D. Miss. 1992). · cites it 3× “*642 Miss.Code Ann. § 25-9-107 defines state service employees as “all employees of state departments, agencies and institutions as defined herein, except those officers and employees excluded by this chapter.”
Wright v. White, 693 So. 2d 898 (Miss. 1997). “The Plaintiffs in the case sub judice were "state service" employees of the State Department of Health, Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (b), whose employment grievances had been brought before the EAB.”
Ishee v. Moss, 668 F. Supp. 554 (N.D. Miss. 1987). · cites it 5× “The dispute between the parties herein is whether a district forester for the State Forestry Commission is a “state service” employée or a “nonstate service” employee as defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 25-9-107. That statute provides, in pertinent part: (b) “State service” shall…”
Scanlon v. Dep't of Mental Health, 828 F. Supp. 421 (S.D. Miss. 1993). · cites it 3× “Specifically, the court stated: This court has previously found in this cause that [plaintiff] was covered by Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (c)(xv) (Supp.”
Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. Rutland, 965 So. 2d 696 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (Rev.2006). A key distinction between state service employees and non-state service employees is that state service employees may only be terminated *700 for good cause, after written notice and a hearing.”
Darold L. Rutland v. Mike Moore, Attorney Gen. of the State of Mississippi, 54 F.3d 226 (5th Cir. 1995). “Also pursuant to § 630(f), its exemptions notwithstanding, an individual subject to the civil service laws of a state government, a governmental agency, or a political subdivision is still considered an employee for purposes of the ADEA. 29 U.”
Reid v. Mississippi State Hosp./Mississippi Dep't of Mental Health, 53 So. 3d 823 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (Rev.2006). A key distinction between state service employees and non-state service employees is that state service employees may only be terminated for good cause, after written notice and a hearing.”
Black v. MS Dept of Rehab. Svc (5th Cir. 2023). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (c)(xvi). 2 Case: 22-60409 Document: 00516808851 Page: 3 Date Filed: 07/05/2023 No.”
Sanders v. Mississippi Dep't of Rehab. Servs. (S.D. Miss. 2022). “40 at 7 (citing Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (c)(xvi)), and that others were appointed.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107(b) — 2 cases
McMurtray v. Holladay, 11 F.3d 499 (5th Cir. 1993). “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-9-107(b), (c). State service employees are afforded the protections of the state personnel system.”
Buford v. Holladay, 791 F. Supp. 635 (S.D. Miss. 1992). “*642 Miss.Code Ann. § 25-9-107 defines state service employees as “all employees of state departments, agencies and institutions as defined herein, except those officers and employees excluded by this chapter.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107(c)(vii) — 1 case
McMurtray v. Holladay, 11 F.3d 499 (5th Cir. 1993). “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-9-107(b), (c). State service employees are afforded the protections of the state personnel system.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107(c)(xiii) — 3 cases
Darold L. Rutland v. Mike Moore, Attorney Gen. of the State of Mississippi, 54 F.3d 226 (5th Cir. 1995). “Also pursuant to § 630(f), its exemptions notwithstanding, an individual subject to the civil service laws of a state government, a governmental agency, or a political subdivision is still considered an employee for purposes of the ADEA. 29 U.”
Scanlon v. Dep't of Mental Health, 828 F. Supp. 421 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “Specifically, the court stated: This court has previously found in this cause that [plaintiff] was covered by Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (c)(xv) (Supp.”
Rutland v. Off. of Atty. Gen., State of Miss., 851 F. Supp. 793 (S.D. Miss. 1994).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107(c)(xv) — 1 case
Ishee v. Moss, 668 F. Supp. 554 (N.D. Miss. 1987). “The dispute between the parties herein is whether a district forester for the State Forestry Commission is a “state service” employée or a “nonstate service” employee as defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 25-9-107. That statute provides, in pertinent part: (b) “State service” shall…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107(e) — 1 case
Scanlon v. Dep't of Mental Health, 828 F. Supp. 421 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “Specifically, the court stated: This court has previously found in this cause that [plaintiff] was covered by Miss. Code Ann. § 25-9-107 (c)(xv) (Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.