Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 27-10-1 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1994, ch. 348, § 11, eff. 1/1/1995.

Repealed by Laws, 2020, ch. 406, SB 2851,§ 87, eff. 7/1/2020.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1999–2005 · leading case: Last Will & Testament of Lawson v. Lambert, 792 So. 2d 977 (Miss. 2001).
Last Will & Testament of Lawson v. Lambert, 792 So. 2d 977 (Miss. 2001). · cites it 2× “The Mississippi Uniform Estate Tax Apportionment Act, Miss.Code Ann. §§ 27-10-1 to 27-10-25 (1999), requires that estate taxes be apportioned unless the decedent's will directs otherwise.”
In Re Est. of Necaise, 915 So. 2d 449 (Miss. 2005). · cites it 4× “See, Miss.Code Ann. § 27-10-1, et seq.... It is clear under the statute that: (1) any person receiving transfers of assets must bear their pro rata share of the gift and estate tax resulting if that transfer is included in the decedent's taxable estate; and (2) the testator may…”
Raymond Necaise v. Cheryl Seay (Miss. 2004). · cites it 4× “See, Miss. Code Ann. § 27-10-1 , et seq.... It is clear under the statute that: (1) any person receiving transfers of assets must bear their pro rata share of the gift and estate tax resulting if that transfer is included in the decedent’s taxable estate; and (2) the testator…”
Nell Gravlee Lange v. Martha Moore Lambert (Miss. 1999). · cites it 2× “The Mississippi Uniform Estate Tax Apportionment Act, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 27-10-1 to 27-10-25 (1999), requires that estate taxes be apportioned unless the decedent's will directs otherwise.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.