Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-41-191 (2026)

Gestational Age Act; legislative findings and purpose; definitions; abortion limited to fifteen weeks' gestation; exceptions; requisite report; reporting forms; professional sanctions; civil penalties; additional enforcement; construction; severability; right to intervene if constitutionality challenged

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Added by Laws, 2018, ch. 393, HB 1510,§ 1, eff. 3/19/2018.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg (Ariz. 2024).
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg (Ariz. 2024). · cites it 3× “See Miss. Code Ann. § 41-41-191 (8) (2018). We are unpersuaded.”
Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. Mark Brnovich (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 41-41-191 (8) (2018). Arizona’s 15-week law contains no such clause despite otherwise mirroring Mississippi’s law, almost word for word, in all other respects.”
Planned Parenthood Great Nw. v. State (Idaho 2023). “at 2243, 2284 (upholding Mississippi’s abortion law—Miss. Code Ann. § 41-41-191 (2018)—that contains an exception for “medical emergenc[ies]” which tracks the language of EMTALA).”
Bernard, M.D. v. Individual Members of the Indiana Med. Licensing Bd. (S.D. Ind. 2023). “at 2284 (citing Miss. Code Ann. § 41-41-191 (4)(b)). Courts have in other contexts described elective procedures as those "medically acceptable [but] not always necessary," Hum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.