Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (2026)
Transfer of cases from other courts
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1) When a person appears before a court other than the youth court, and it is determined that the person is a child under jurisdiction of the youth court, such court shall, unless the jurisdiction of the offense has been transferred to such court as provided in this chapter, or unless the child has previously been the subject of a transfer from the youth court to the circuit court for trial as an adult and was convicted, immediately dismiss the proceeding without prejudice and forward all documents pertaining to the cause to the youth court; and all entries in permanent records shall be expunged. The youth court shall have the power to order and supervise the expunction or the destruction of such records in accordance with Section 43-21-265. Upon petition therefor, the youth court shall expunge the record of any case within its jurisdiction in which an arrest was made, the person arrested was released and the case was dismissed or the charges were dropped, there was no disposition of such case, or the person was found not delinquent.
In cases where the child is charged with a hunting or fishing violation or a traffic violation, whether it be any state or federal law, a violation of the Mississippi Implied Consent Law, or municipal ordinance or county resolution, or where the child is charged with a violation of Section 67-3-70, the appropriate criminal court shall proceed to dispose of the same in the same manner as for other adult offenders and it shall not be necessary to transfer the case to the youth court of the county. However, unless the cause has been transferred, or unless the child has previously been the subject of a transfer from the youth court to the circuit court for trial as an adult and was convicted, the youth court shall have power on its own motion to remove jurisdiction from any criminal court of any offense including a hunting or fishing violation, a traffic violation, a violation of the Mississippi Implied Consent Law, or a violation of Section 67-3-70, committed by a child in a matter under the jurisdiction of the youth court and proceed therewith in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
- (2) After conviction and sentence of any child by any other court having original jurisdiction on a misdemeanor charge, and within the time allowed for an appeal of such conviction and sentence, the youth court of the county shall have the full power to stay the execution of the sentence and to release the child on good behavior or on other order as the youth court may see fit to make unless the child has previously been the subject of a transfer from the youth court to the circuit court for trial as an adult and was convicted. When a child is convicted of a misdemeanor and is committed to, incarcerated in or imprisoned in a jail or other place of detention by a criminal court having proper jurisdiction of such charge, such court shall notify the youth court judge or the judge's designee of the conviction and sentence prior to the commencement of such incarceration. The youth court shall have the power to order and supervise the destruction of any records involving children maintained by the criminal court in accordance with Section 43-21-265. However, the youth court shall have the power to set aside a judgment of any other court rendered in any matter over which the youth court has exclusive original jurisdiction, to expunge or destroy the records thereof in accordance with Section 43-21-265, and to order a refund of fines and costs.
- (3) Nothing in subsection (1) or (2) shall apply to a youth who has a pending charge or a conviction for any crime over which circuit court has original jurisdiction.
- (4) In any case wherein the defendant is a child as defined in this chapter and of which the circuit court has original jurisdiction, the circuit judge, upon a finding that it would be in the best interest of such child and in the interest of justice, may at any stage of the proceedings prior to the attachment of jeopardy transfer such proceedings to the youth court for further proceedings unless the child has previously been the subject of a transfer from the youth court to the circuit court for trial as an adult and was convicted or has previously been convicted of a crime which was in original circuit court jurisdiction, and the youth court shall, upon acquiring jurisdiction, proceed as provided in this chapter for the adjudication and disposition of delinquent child proceeding proceedings. If the case is not transferred to the youth court and the youth is convicted of a crime by any circuit court, the trial judge shall sentence the youth as though such youth was an adult. The circuit court shall not have the authority to commit such child to the custody of the Department of Youth Services for placement in a state-supported training school.
- (5) In no event shall a court sentence an offender over the age of eighteen (18) to the custody of the Division of Youth Services for placement in a state-supported training school.
- (6) When a child's driver's license is suspended by the youth court for any reason, the clerk of the youth court shall report the suspension, without a court order under Section 43-21-261, to the Commissioner of Public Safety in the same manner as such suspensions are reported in cases involving adults.
- (7) No offense involving the use or possession of a firearm by a child who has reached his fifteenth birthday and which, if committed by an adult would be a felony, shall be transferred to the youth court.
Laws, 1979, ch. 506, § 19; Laws, 1980, ch. 550, § 7; Laws, 1983, ch. 435, § 9; Laws, 1985, ch. 431, § 5; Laws, 1986, ch. 467, § 2; Laws, 1994, ch. 595, § 3; Laws, 1996, ch. 454, § 2; Laws, 1996, ch. 527, § 17; Laws, 2003, ch. 557, § 1; Laws, 2012, ch. 564, § 1, eff. 7/1/2012.
Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 466, HB 1352,§ 40, eff. 7/1/2019.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: Hoops v. State, 681 So. 2d 521 (Miss. 1996).
Hoops v. State, 681 So. 2d 521 (Miss. 1996). “*536 Hoops claims that the trial judge was precluded from sentencing him under Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (3), a youthful offender statute, since he was no longer a child as defined by the legislature under the youthful offender laws.”
Young v. State, 797 So. 2d 239 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “The State asserts that the trial court did not commit an error and that the trial judge answered Young's allegation when it explained that although Young was seventeen years of age at the time of the commission of the crimes, he was under the original jurisdiction of the circuit…”
Gary v. State, 760 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 2000). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159(3)(Supp.1993) [6] provided in relevant part as follows: [I]f any child shall be convicted by any circuit court, the trial judge may in his discretion, commit such child to the county jail for any term not in excess of one (1) year, or he may suspend…”
Strahan v. State, 729 So. 2d 800 (Miss. 1998). “NOTES [1] It should be noted that the circuit court had statutory jurisdiction over this case under, Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (7) (Supp.1994), which provides that "[n]o offense involving the use or possession of a firearm by a child who has reached his fifteenth birthday and…”
Foster v. State, 639 So. 2d 1263 (Miss. 1994). “), provides inter alia, In any case wherein the defendant is a child as defined in this chapter and of which the circuit court has original jurisdiction, the circuit judge upon a finding that it would be in the best interest of such child and in the interest of justice, may at…”
Flowers v. State, 805 So. 2d 654 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “However, a review of Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (Rev.2000) shows that the Youth Court Law does not offer Flowers an additional sentencing alternative and establishes that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion when sentencing Flowers.”
Foster v. State, 687 So. 2d 1124 (Miss. 1996). “" Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (Supp. 1994).”
Ward v. State, 914 So. 2d 332 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). “However, the 2000 version of the statute reads, "If the case is not transferred to the youth court and the youth is convicted of a crime by any circuit court, the trial judge shall sentence the youth as though such youth was an adult.”
Horne v. State, 825 So. 2d 627 (Miss. 2002). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159(4) (2000). The power to transfer the case is clearly permissive, not mandatory.”
Chrissy F., by Her Next Friend & Guardian Ad Litem Donna Medley v. Mississippi Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 925 F.2d 844 (5th Cir. 1991). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (1972 & Supp. 1990).”
Swinford v. State, 653 So. 2d 912 (Miss. 1995). “Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (3) (Supp. 1990) reads, in part: [I]f any child shall be convicted by any circuit court, the trial judge may, in his discretion, commit such child to the county jail for any term not in excess of one (1) year, or he may suspend sentence and release on…”
Moody v. State, 838 So. 2d 324 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159(4) (Rev.2000).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159(3) — 5 cases
Gary v. State, 760 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 2000). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159(3)(Supp.1993) [6] provided in relevant part as follows: [I]f any child shall be convicted by any circuit court, the trial judge may in his discretion, commit such child to the county jail for any term not in excess of one (1) year, or he may suspend…”
Strahan v. State, 729 So. 2d 800 (Miss. 1998). “NOTES [1] It should be noted that the circuit court had statutory jurisdiction over this case under, Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (7) (Supp.1994), which provides that "[n]o offense involving the use or possession of a firearm by a child who has reached his fifteenth birthday and…”
Flowers v. State, 805 So. 2d 654 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “However, a review of Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (Rev.2000) shows that the Youth Court Law does not offer Flowers an additional sentencing alternative and establishes that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion when sentencing Flowers.”
Young v. State, 797 So. 2d 239 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “The State asserts that the trial court did not commit an error and that the trial judge answered Young's allegation when it explained that although Young was seventeen years of age at the time of the commission of the crimes, he was under the original jurisdiction of the circuit…”
Ward v. State, 914 So. 2d 332 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). “However, the 2000 version of the statute reads, "If the case is not transferred to the youth court and the youth is convicted of a crime by any circuit court, the trial judge shall sentence the youth as though such youth was an adult.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159(3)(1993) — 2 cases
State v. U.G., 726 So. 2d 151 (Miss. 1998).
State v. UG, 726 So. 2d 151 (Miss. 1998).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159(4) — 12 cases
Horne v. State, 825 So. 2d 627 (Miss. 2002). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159(4) (2000). The power to transfer the case is clearly permissive, not mandatory.”
Gary v. State, 760 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 2000). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159(3)(Supp.1993) [6] provided in relevant part as follows: [I]f any child shall be convicted by any circuit court, the trial judge may in his discretion, commit such child to the county jail for any term not in excess of one (1) year, or he may suspend…”
Strahan v. State, 729 So. 2d 800 (Miss. 1998). “NOTES [1] It should be noted that the circuit court had statutory jurisdiction over this case under, Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159 (7) (Supp.1994), which provides that "[n]o offense involving the use or possession of a firearm by a child who has reached his fifteenth birthday and…”
Young v. State, 797 So. 2d 239 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “The State asserts that the trial court did not commit an error and that the trial judge answered Young's allegation when it explained that although Young was seventeen years of age at the time of the commission of the crimes, he was under the original jurisdiction of the circuit…”
Moody v. State, 838 So. 2d 324 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-159(4) (Rev.2000).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-159(7) — 2 cases
Gladney v. State, 963 So. 2d 1217 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007).
Cockrell v. State, 811 So. 2d 305 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.