Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-261 (2026)

[Repealed effective 7/1/2026] Disclosure of records

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1979, ch. 506, § 28; Laws, 1980, ch. 550, § 4; Laws, 1986, ch. 422, § 1; Laws, 1988, ch. 459; Laws, 1989, ch. 433, § 1; Laws, 1991, ch. 468 § 6; Laws, 1994, ch. 591, § 2; Laws, 1994, ch. 595, § 5; Laws, 1995, ch. 547, § 3; Laws, 1997, ch. 440, § 8; Laws, 1998, ch. 447, § 1; Laws, 1998, ch. 516, § 19; Laws, 2000, ch. 436, § 2; Laws, 2000, ch. 499, § 23; Laws, 2001, ch. 360, § 1; Laws, 2001, ch. 393, § 12; Laws, 2004, ch. 489, § 2; Laws, 2006, ch. 600, § 3; Laws, 2007, ch. 478, § 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 587, § 11; Laws, 2010, ch. 349, § 1, eff. 7/1/2010.

Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 525, HB 1624,§ 13, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 480, HB 1315,§ 4, eff. 5/8/2024.

Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 419, SB 2376,§ 1, eff. 3/21/2023.

Amended by Laws, 2022, ch. 440, HB 1313,§ 4, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 464, SB 2840,§ 2, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by Laws, 2019, ch. 473, SB 2576,§ 3, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by Laws, 2017, ch. 420, HB 1213, 2, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by Laws, 2014, ch. 375, HB 593, 2, eff. 7/1/2014.

Amended by Laws, 2013, ch. 531, SB 2388, 1, eff. 7/1/2013.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: Cruz v. Jackson Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 133 So. 3d 335 (Miss. 2013).
Cruz v. Jackson Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 133 So. 3d 335 (Miss. 2013). · cites it 7× “5(b) and Miss.Code Ann. 43-21-261, and further this Court Orders that no one in the hearing this date shall disclose information concerning this case to the Media.”
Daniels by Glass v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 634 So. 2d 88 (Miss. 1993). · cites it 4× “The decree which authorized release of the information noted that Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-261 (7) (Supp. 1992) allows the victim of the offense "to be informed of the disposition of the Youth Court cause, with no restrictions on the victim's use and (sic) said information.”
Reeder v. State, 783 So. 2d 711 (Miss. 2001). · cites it 2× “" He further notes that under Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-261, his youth court records must remain confidential.”
Eakes v. State, 665 So. 2d 852 (Miss. 1995). “412 claim is addressed herein, at issue K, with a conclusion that Eakes was not prevented from offering any evidence at trial as a result of his failure to file a fifteen-day motion. [14] When Palmer showed June the male and female dolls, she showed no reaction.”
Yarborough v. State, 514 So. 2d 1215 (Miss. 1987). · cites it 2× “Yarborough relies on the statute governing the confidentiality of Youth Court proceedings, Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-261 (1972). The precursor to Section 43-21-261, Miss.”
Hall v. Jackson Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 225 So. 3d 1220 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-261(3) (Rev.2015); U.”
M.A.S. v. Miss. Dep't of Human Servs. (In Re M.A.S.), 245 So. 3d 410 (Miss. 2018). · cites it 2× “See Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-251 ; Miss. Code Ann.”
Windham v. State, 800 So. 2d 1257 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-261 (Rev.2000). The authority to release records is vested in the discretion of the youth court judge.”
Hampton v. Oktibbeha Cnty. Sheriff Dep't, 480 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2007). “The Mississippi statute governing youth records indicates that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section, records involving children shall not be disclosed, other than to necessary staff of the youth court, except pursuant to an order of the youth court.”
State v. U.G., 726 So. 2d 151 (Miss. 1998). “In regard to the youth court records, Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-261(1993) recognizes the confidentiality of certain documents and states that they may disclosed to certain parties only through court order.”
Corrothers v. State, 189 So. 3d 612 (Miss. 2015). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-261(l)(g) (Supp.2014).”
M.D.H. v. State, 726 So. 2d 547 (Miss. 1998). “Such court orders for disclosure shall be limited to those instances *550 in which the youth court concludes, in its discretion, that disclosure is required for the best interests of the child, the public safety or the functioning of the youth court and then only to the…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-261(1) — 2 cases
Cruz v. Jackson Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 133 So. 3d 335 (Miss. 2013). “5(b) and Miss.Code Ann. 43-21-261, and further this Court Orders that no one in the hearing this date shall disclose information concerning this case to the Media.”
Hampton v. Oktibbeha Cnty. Sheriff Dep't, 480 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2007). “The Mississippi statute governing youth records indicates that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section, records involving children shall not be disclosed, other than to necessary staff of the youth court, except pursuant to an order of the youth court.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-261(1993) — 2 cases
State v. U.G., 726 So. 2d 151 (Miss. 1998). “In regard to the youth court records, Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-261(1993) recognizes the confidentiality of certain documents and states that they may disclosed to certain parties only through court order.”
State v. UG, 726 So. 2d 151 (Miss. 1998).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-261(2) — 1 case
Cruz v. Jackson Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 133 So. 3d 335 (Miss. 2013). “5(b) and Miss.Code Ann. 43-21-261, and further this Court Orders that no one in the hearing this date shall disclose information concerning this case to the Media.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-261(3) — 1 case
Hall v. Jackson Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 225 So. 3d 1220 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-261(3) (Rev.2015); U.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-261(l)(a) — 1 case
Cruz v. Jackson Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 133 So. 3d 335 (Miss. 2013). “5(b) and Miss.Code Ann. 43-21-261, and further this Court Orders that no one in the hearing this date shall disclose information concerning this case to the Media.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-21-261(l)(g) — 1 case
Corrothers v. State, 189 So. 3d 612 (Miss. 2015). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 43-21-261(l)(g) (Supp.2014).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.