Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 43-39-5 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter:

Codes, 1942, § 2749-72; Laws, 1972, ch. 526, § 2; Laws, 1989, ch. 421, § 1; Laws, 1996, ch. 445, § 2, eff. 3/29/1996.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1986–1999 · leading case: Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 186 Cal. App. 3d 897 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986).
Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 186 Cal. App. 3d 897 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “79A, § 1; Miss. Code Ann. § 43-39-5 , subd. (c); Mont.”
Lamar Corp. v. State High. Com'n, 684 So. 2d 601 (Miss. 1996). · cites it 3× “Miss. Code Ann. § 43-39-5 (d) (1993). The statute that requires relocation costs to be paid, states, inter alia, that: (1) If a displacing agency acquires real property for public use, it shall make fair and reasonable relocation payments to displaced persons and businesses as…”
Brown v. Mississippi Transp. Com'n, 749 So. 2d 948 (Miss. 1999). “Additionally, the Browns argue that Hazel Brown, as a displaced person or business as described in § 43-39-5 is entitled to the additional $25,000 payment under § 43-39-9.”
Lamar Corp v. Mississippi State High. Comm'n (Miss. 1993). · cites it 3× “Miss. Code Ann. § 43-39-5 (d)(1993). ¶25.”
Wendell L. Brown v. Mississippi Transp. Comm'n (Miss. 1998). “Additionally, the Browns argue that Hazel Brown, as a displaced person or business as described in § 43-39-5 is entitled to the additional $25,000 payment under § 43-39-9.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 43-39-5(d) — 2 cases
Lamar Corp. v. State High. Com'n, 684 So. 2d 601 (Miss. 1996). “Miss. Code Ann. § 43-39-5 (d) (1993). The statute that requires relocation costs to be paid, states, inter alia, that: (1) If a displacing agency acquires real property for public use, it shall make fair and reasonable relocation payments to displaced persons and businesses as…”
Lamar Corp v. Mississippi State High. Comm'n (Miss. 1993). “Miss. Code Ann. § 43-39-5 (d)(1993). ¶25.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.