Miss. Code Ann. » Miss. Code Ann. / Title 75 / Chapter 21

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-21-9

Private persons and corporations may sue

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person, natural or artificial, injured or damaged by a trust and combine as herein defined, or by its effects direct or indirect, may recover all damages of every kind sustained by him or it and in addition a penalty of five hundred dollars ($500.00), by suit in any court of competent jurisdiction. Said suit may be brought against one or more of the parties to the trust or combine and one or more of the officers and representatives of any corporation a party to the same, or one or more of either. Such penalty may be recovered in each instance of injury. All recoveries herein provided for may be sued for in one suit.

Codes, 1892, § 4440; 1906, § 5007; Hemingway's 1917, § 3289; 1930, § 3440; 1942, § 1092; Laws, 1926, ch. 182.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases, 1980–2020 · leading case: Hood Ex Rel. Mississippi v. Microsoft Corp.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hood Ex Rel. Mississippi v. Microsoft Corp. (2006) mssd · cites it 6× “To resolve this dispute, the Supreme Court has stated that one indication of whether the injury is sufficient to give the State parens patriae standing is whether the injury is one the State could redress through its sovereign lawmaking powers: Although more must be alleged than…”
Young Refining Corp. v. Pennzoil Co. (2001) texapp · cites it 2× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-21-9 (2001). Specifically, plaintiffs claim that, “[b]y entering into their contract to sell 100% of Pennzoil’s Baxterville Field production to Southland, knowing that such a deal would jeopardize the existence of Young Refining, the Defendant’s [sic]…”
Hood v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd. (2009) dcd · cites it 3× “The only other damages provision identified in the Mississippi Antitrust Act is Miss.Code § 75-21-9, which previously was titled “Private Persons and Corporations May Sue” 7 and stated that: Any person, natural or artificial, injured or damaged by a trust and combine as herein…”
In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation (2012) paed · cites it 2× “” Miss.Code Ann. § 75-21-9. The statute defines a “trust or combine,” as “a combination, contract, understanding or agreement, expressed or implied, between two or more persons, corporations or firms or association of persons or between any one or more of either with one or more…”
Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co. (2005) tenn “57 (1984); Miss. Code Ann. § 75-21-9 (2005); Neb.Rev.”
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982) scotus “9 See Miss. Code Ann. §75-21-9 (1972). The court made clear that under this theory intentional participation in the concerted action rendered each defendant directly liable for all resulting damages.”
Bunker's Glass Co. v. PILKINGTON, PLC (2003) ariz · cites it 2× “57 (1995); Mississippi, Miss.Code Ann. § 75-21-9 (2000); Nebraska, Neb.”
Johnson v. Microsoft Corp. (2005) ohio “57; Mississippi, Miss.Code Ann. 75-21-9; Nebraska, Neb.Rev.”
Supreme Auto Transport, LLC v. Arcelor Mittal USA, Inc. (2018) ca7 “57 ; Miss. Code Ann. § 75-21-9 ; Neb. Rev. Stat.”
California v. ARC America Corp. (1989) scotus “1988); Miss. Code Ann. § 75-21-9 (1972); N. M. Stat.”
Owens Corning v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co. (2004) miss · cites it 2× “Said suit may be brought against one or more of the parties to the trust or combine and one or more of the officers and representatives of any corporation a party to the same, or one or more of either.”
Union Carbide Corp. v. Superior Court (1984) cal · cites it 2× “38, § 60-7(2) (amended 1979); Mississippi, Miss. Code Ann., § 75-21-9 (1973); New Mexico, N.”
Show all 29 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.