Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-67-425 (2026)

Oath required for new or transferred license; application; contents of application

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) An application for a new title pledge office license, the transfer of an existing title pledge office license or the approval of a change in the ownership of a licensed title pledge office shall be under oath and shall state the full name and place of residence of the applicant, the place where the business is to be conducted and other relevant information required by the commissioner. If the applicant is a partnership, the application shall state the full name of each partner. If the applicant is a corporation, the application shall state the full name and address of each officer, shareholder and director.

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the application need not state the full name and address of each shareholder, if the applicant is owned directly or beneficially by a person which as an issuer has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or is an issuer of securities which is required to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, provided that such person files with the commissioner such information, documents and reports as are required by the provision of the Securities Exchange Act to be filed by such issuer with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Laws, 1997, ch. 610, § 14, eff. 4/22/1997.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: All Am. Check Cashing, Inc. v. Corley, 191 F. Supp. 3d 646 (S.D. Miss. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

All Am. Check Cashing, Inc. v. Corley, 191 F. Supp. 3d 646 (S.D. Miss. 2016). “in violation of the provisions of this article”); based on statements from customers, it had identified another 1,789 transactions that it considered were illegal fee-only transactions, 6 which would support a penalty of $894,500 ($500 per transaction) together with an…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.