Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203 (2026)

Attachment and enforceability of security interest; proceeds; supporting obligations; formal requisites

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 527, § 60, eff. 7/1/2006.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2023 · leading case: Gibson v. Manuel, 534 So. 2d 199 (Miss. 1988).
Gibson v. Manuel, 534 So. 2d 199 (Miss. 1988). “Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203 (1) and (2) (1972).”
O & G Leasing, LLC v. First Sec. Bank (In Re O & G Leasing, LLC), 456 B.R. 652 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2011). · cites it 2× “Regardless of the order they are completed, as long as the security agreement satisfies all of the elements under Miss. Code § 75-9-203, the security interest attaches to the collateral.”
First Bank v. E. Livestock Co., 837 F. Supp. 792 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203(l)(a). 7 That security interest is “perfected” when the secured party files an effective financing statement including, inter alia, “a description of the farm products subject to the security interest” established by the security agreement.”
W.C. Fore Trucking Co. v. Biloxi Prestress Concrete, Inc., 98 F.3d 204 (5th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “Issues raised in the briefs regarding whether the security interest of Fore attached and was enforceable and whether the collateral description was sufficient pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203 (Supp.1994) need not be determined here.”
Crosby v. Peoples Bank of Indianola, 472 So. 2d 951 (Miss. 1985). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203(1) (1972). Moreover, that security interest had become enforceable as between the parties.”
Peoples Bank v. Bryan Bros. Cattle Co., 504 F.3d 549 (5th Cir. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203(b). 9 . Id. § 13-3-55.”
United States v. Se. Mississippi Livestock Farmers Ass'n, 619 F.2d 435 (5th Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203 (1972) (amended 1977) provided in pertinent part: (1) Subject to the provisions of Section 4-208 [§ 75 — 4-208] on the security interest of a collecting bank and Section 9-113 [§ 75-9-113] on a security interest arising under the chapter on Sales, a…”
Greenville Riverboat, LLC v. Less, Getz & Lipman, P.L.L.C., 131 F. Supp. 2d 842 (S.D. Miss. 2000). “Miss.Code Ann. §§ 75-9-203, 75-9-110. 9 .”
South Mississippi Fin. Co. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm'n, 605 So. 2d 736 (Miss. 1992). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203(l)(c) (1972); C.”
Ford Motor Credit v. STATE BANK & TRUST, 571 So. 2d 937 (Miss. 1990). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203 (1)(a), (b) and (c) (Supp.”
Orix Credit All., Inc. v. Heard Fam. Trucking, Inc., 177 B.R. 68 (S.D. Miss. 1994). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203. 7 . In support of this finding, the bankruptcy judge cited the sales contract which indicated that the truck would be kept at Heard Trucking’s principal place of'business, Route 1 Box 81, Brooks-ville, Mississippi.”
U.S. Small Bus. Admin. v. Guar. Bank & Trust Co., 874 F.2d 997 (5th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “But whether or not it owned the farming equipment, it had “rights in the collateral” sufficient to enable it to grant a security interest pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203. We will address What-ley Farms’s corporate existence and then the validity of the SBA’s security…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203(1) — 3 cases
United States v. Se. Mississippi Livestock Farmers Ass'n, 619 F.2d 435 (5th Cir. 1980). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203 (1972) (amended 1977) provided in pertinent part: (1) Subject to the provisions of Section 4-208 [§ 75 — 4-208] on the security interest of a collecting bank and Section 9-113 [§ 75-9-113] on a security interest arising under the chapter on Sales, a…”
W.C. Fore Trucking Co. v. Biloxi Prestress Concrete, Inc., 98 F.3d 204 (5th Cir. 1996). “Issues raised in the briefs regarding whether the security interest of Fore attached and was enforceable and whether the collateral description was sufficient pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203 (Supp.1994) need not be determined here.”
Crosby v. Peoples Bank of Indianola, 472 So. 2d 951 (Miss. 1985). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203(1) (1972). Moreover, that security interest had become enforceable as between the parties.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203(1)(a)(b)(c) — 1 case
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203(2) — 1 case
Crosby v. Peoples Bank of Indianola, 472 So. 2d 951 (Miss. 1985). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203(1) (1972). Moreover, that security interest had become enforceable as between the parties.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203(a) — 1 case
O & G Leasing, LLC v. First Sec. Bank (In Re O & G Leasing, LLC), 456 B.R. 652 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2011). “Regardless of the order they are completed, as long as the security agreement satisfies all of the elements under Miss. Code § 75-9-203, the security interest attaches to the collateral.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203(b) — 1 case
Peoples Bank v. Bryan Bros. Cattle Co., 504 F.3d 549 (5th Cir. 2007). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203(b). 9 . Id. § 13-3-55.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203(l)(a) — 1 case
First Bank v. E. Livestock Co., 837 F. Supp. 792 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203(l)(a). 7 That security interest is “perfected” when the secured party files an effective financing statement including, inter alia, “a description of the farm products subject to the security interest” established by the security agreement.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-203(l)(c) — 1 case
South Mississippi Fin. Co. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm'n, 605 So. 2d 736 (Miss. 1992). “” Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-203(l)(c) (1972); C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.