Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (2026)

through 85-7-185 - [Repealed]

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Laws, 2014, ch. 487, SB 2622, 24, eff. 4/11/2014.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases, 1978–2017 · leading case: Noatex Corp. v. King Constr. of Houston, L.L.C., 732 F.3d 479 (5th Cir. 2013).
Noatex Corp. v. King Constr. of Houston, L.L.C., 732 F.3d 479 (5th Cir. 2013). · cites it 3× “STEWART, Chief Judge: These appeals arise out of the district court’s resolution of matters concerning an invocation of Mississippi’s “Stop Notice” statute, Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (“Stop Notice statute”), by King Construction of Houston.”
Amerihost Dev., Inc. v. Bromanco, Inc., 786 So. 2d 362 (Miss. 2001). · cites it 5× “Save an amendment in 1987 allowing reasonable attorney's fees, Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181 has remained unchanged since it was amended to its present form in 1918.”
Auto Parts Mfg. Mississippi, Inc. v. King Constr. of Houston, L.L.C., 782 F.3d 186 (5th Cir. 2015). “On September 23, 2011, King filed a Stop Notice pursuant to Mississippi’s Stop Notice statute, Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (repealed 2014).”
Associated Dealers v. Mississippi Roofing, 589 So. 2d 1245 (Miss. 1991). · cites it 4× “Based on this finding, the chancellor concluded that Frierson, Addison, and Mississippi Roofing were materialmen to the contractor and awarded them a pro rata share of the interpled funds pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (Supp. 1987). [2] The chancellor also found that the…”
Georgia Pac. Corp. v. Sigma Serv. Corp., 712 F.2d 962 (5th Cir. 1983). “Miss.Code § 85-7-181 (1942). This statute provides, in relevant part: §85-7-181.”
Chic Creations of Bonita Lakes Mall v. Doleac Elec. Co., Inc., 791 So. 2d 254 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 3× “Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (Rev.1999). ¶ 13.”
Aladdin Const. Co. v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co., 914 So. 2d 169 (Miss. 2005). “John Hancock argues that McMo was not its agent, but rather a general contractor and Plaintiffs, should be considered subcontractors who, by failing to timely utilize Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (1999) (the "stop notice" statute), are estopped from recovery against John Hancock.”
Timms v. Pearson, 876 So. 2d 1083 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “” Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (Rev.1999). In other words, when the unpaid subcontractor gives written notice (commonly termed a “stop notice”) to the owner, the subcontractor becomes entitled to payment from the owner up to the amount in which the owner is indebted to the general…”
Falkner v. Stubbs, 121 So. 3d 899 (Miss. 2013). “Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (Rev.2011). Stubbs’s claim, however, involves a dispute directly between a contractor and a project owner.”
Auto Parts Mfg. Mississippi Inc. v. King Constr. of Houston, LLC, 258 F. Supp. 3d 740 (N.D. Miss. 2017). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (“[T]he amount that may be due .”
Noatex Corp. v. King Constr. of Houston, LLC, 864 F. Supp. 2d 478 (N.D. Miss. 2012). “Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181.” Docket 14, p.”
Summerall Elec. Co. v. Church of God at Southaven, 25 So. 3d 1090 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “” Miss.Code Ann. § 85-7-181 (Rev.1999). In other words, when the unpaid subcontractor gives written notice (commonly termed a “stop notice”) to the owner, the subcontractor becomes entitled to payment from the owner up to the amount in which the owner is indebted to the general…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.