Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 27. CIVIL LIABILITY, REMEDIES, AND LIMITATIONS · CHAPTER 30. NUISANCES · Part 1. General Provisions
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 27-30-102 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 27
  3. CHAPTER 30
  4. Part 1
  5. 27-30-102 Repealed

TITLE 27. CIVIL LIABILITY, REMEDIES, AND LIMITATIONS

CHAPTER 30. NUISANCES

Part 1. General Provisions

Repealed

27-30-102. Repealed. Sec. 12, Ch. 531, L. 2025.

History: (1)En. Sec. 4551, Civ. C. 1895; re-en. Sec. 6163, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 8643, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. Civ. C. Sec. 3480; Based on Field Civ. C. Sec. 1950; re-en. Sec. 8643, R.C.M. 1935; Sec. 57-102, R.C.M. 1947; (2)En. Sec. 4552, Civ. C. 1895; re-en. Sec. 6164, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 8644, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. Civ. C. Sec. 3481; Field Civ. C. Sec. 1951; re-en. Sec. 8644, R.C.M. 1935; Sec. 57-103, R.C.M. 1947; R.C.M. 1947, 57-102, 57-103.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Tally Bissell Neighbors, Inc. v. Eyrie Shotgun Ranch, LLC, 2010 MT 63 (Mont. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tally Bissell Neighbors, Inc. v. Eyrie Shotgun Ranch, LLC, 2010 MT 63 (Mont. 2010). · cites it 13× “The court determined that § 27-30-102, MCA, barred the private nuisance claim because the alleged condition-noise-could not constitute both a private and public nuisance.”
Town of Superior v. Asarco, Inc., 874 F. Supp. 2d 937 (D. Mont. 2004). · cites it 6× “” Mont.Code Ann. § 27-30-102(1). All other nuisances are private.”
Tally Bissell Neigh. v. Eyrie Shotgun Ranch, 2010 MT 63 (Mont. 2010). · cites it 13× “The court determined that § 27-30-102, MCA, barred the private nuisance claim because the alleged condition—noise—could not constitute both a private and public nuisance.”
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Env't Quality v. BNSF Ry. Co., 2010 MT 267 (Mont. 2010). · cites it 3× “¶35 Section 27-30-102(1), MCA, defines a public nuisance as “one which affects, at the same time, an entire community or neighborhood or any considerable number of persons, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal.”
Cottonwood Env't Law Ctr. v. Yellowstone Mountain Club LLC (D. Mont. 2023). · cites it 2× ““Montana adopted § 27-30-102, MCA, verbatim from California Civil Code § 3480.”
Kiser v. United States Bureau of Indian Affairs (9th Cir. 2025). “As the district court recognized, Kiser raised a genuine dispute of fact whether Jackson’s pit bull “terrorized” other neighbors so as to constitute a public nuisance. Finally, as to the vicarious liability theory, reversal is likewise required on Kiser’s negligence per se claim.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 27-30-102(1) — 2 cases
Town of Superior v. Asarco, Inc., 874 F. Supp. 2d 937 (D. Mont. 2004). “” Mont.Code Ann. § 27-30-102(1). All other nuisances are private.”
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Env't Quality v. BNSF Ry. Co., 2010 MT 267 (Mont. 2010). “¶35 Section 27-30-102(1), MCA, defines a public nuisance as “one which affects, at the same time, an entire community or neighborhood or any considerable number of persons, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 27-30-102(2) — 1 case
Town of Superior v. Asarco, Inc., 874 F. Supp. 2d 937 (D. Mont. 2004). “” Mont.Code Ann. § 27-30-102(1). All other nuisances are private.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.