Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 30. TRADE AND COMMERCE · CHAPTER 9. UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECURED TRANSACTIONS (Renumbered and Repealed) · Part 5. Filing (Renumbered and Repealed)
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 30-9-503 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 30
  3. CHAPTER 9
  4. Part 5
  5. 30-9-503 Repealed

TITLE 30. TRADE AND COMMERCE

CHAPTER 9. UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECURED TRANSACTIONS (Renumbered and Repealed)

Part 5. Filing (Renumbered and Repealed)

Repealed

30-9-503. Repealed. Sec. 168, Ch. 305, L. 1999.

History: En. Sec. 9-503, Ch. 264, L. 1963; R.C.M. 1947, 87A-9-503.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1987–1994 · leading case: Martin v. Dorn Equip. Co., Inc., 821 P.2d 1025 (Mont. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Martin v. Dorn Equip. Co., Inc., 821 P.2d 1025 (Mont. 1991). · cites it 6× “” Section 30-9-503, MCA, supplements these contractual default provisions with the following language: “Unless otherwise agreed a secured party has on default the right to take possession of the collateral.”
Montgomery v. Hunt, 738 P.2d 887 (Mont. 1987). · cites it 3× “” It appears that Montgomery did elect to proceed under the UCC and under the UCC Section 30-9-503, MCA, Montgomery as the secured party on the default had the right to take possession of the *282 collateral and the alleged erroneous issuance of the writ of attachment to take…”
Entriken v. Motor Coach Fed. Credit Union, 845 P.2d 93 (Mont. 1992). · cites it 5× “5030, in a provision identical to § 30-9-503, MCA, provides that "[u]nless otherwise agreed a secured party has on default the right to take possession of the collateral.”
Love v. United States, 844 F. Supp. 616 (D. Mont. 1994). · cites it 6× “” Mont.Code Ann. § 30-9-503. Accordingly, the FmHA was authorized to take possession and exercise dominion over its secured collateral once the Loves defaulted on the various security agreements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.