Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 30. TRADE AND COMMERCE · CHAPTER 9. UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECURED TRANSACTIONS (Renumbered and Repealed) · Part 5. Filing (Renumbered and Repealed)
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 30-9-507 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 30
  3. CHAPTER 9
  4. Part 5
  5. 30-9-507 Repealed

TITLE 30. TRADE AND COMMERCE

CHAPTER 9. UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECURED TRANSACTIONS (Renumbered and Repealed)

Part 5. Filing (Renumbered and Repealed)

Repealed

30-9-507. Repealed. Sec. 168, Ch. 305, L. 1999.

History: En. Sec. 9-507, Ch. 264, L. 1963; R.C.M. 1947, 87A-9-507.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1983–1998 · leading case: Ottersen v. Rubick, 803 P.2d 1066 (Mont. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ottersen v. Rubick, 803 P.2d 1066 (Mont. 1990). · cites it 10× “Section 30-9-507(1), MCA, provides an adequate remedy for sale of a minor portion of the collateral: If the disposition has occurred the debtor or any person entitled to notification or whose security interest has been made known to the secured party prior to the disposition has…”
Wippert v. Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian Reservation, 859 P.2d 420 (Mont. 1993). · cites it 4× “The court concluded in its 1984 judgment that the sale of the Wipperts' cattle was commercially reasonable, under § 30-9-507(2), MCA, because the reasonableness of a sale depends on the manner in which the sale is conducted, not the price received; that the steps taken by the…”
Blaine Bank of Montana v. Haugen, 858 P.2d 14 (Mont. 1993). · cites it 4× “When that factor is absent and only a minor portion of the collateral is sold improperly, § 30-9-507(1), MCA, provides an adequate remedy.”
Dulan v. Montana Nat. Bank of Roundup, 661 P.2d 28 (Mont. 1983). · cites it 3× “Section 30-9-507(2), MCA. This Court interpreted these two sections of the UCC in the Talcott case, supra.”
Rose v. Myers, 724 P.2d 176 (Mont. 1986). · cites it 6× “Section 30-9-507(2), MCA, states: The fact that a better price could have been obtained by a sale at a different time or in a different method from that selected by the secured party is not of itself sufficient to establish that the sale was not made in a commercially reasonable…”
Lilly v. Terwilliger, 796 P.2d 199 (Mont. 1990). · cites it 3× “dictates that every aspect of the disposition of collateral, including the method, manner, time, place and terms must be commercially reasonable.”
Auto Credit, Inc. v. Long, 1998 MT 327 (Mont. 1998). · cites it 2× “See § 30-9-507(2), MCA; see also Lilly, 244 Mont.”
Love v. United States, 844 F. Supp. 616 (D. Mont. 1994). · cites it 4× “If the disposition has occurred the debtor or any person entitled to notification or whose security interest has been made known to the secured party prior to the disposition has a right to recover from the secured party any loss caused by failure to comply with the provisions…”
Mack Fin. Corp. v. Tezak, 834 P.2d 396 (Mont. 1992). · cites it 2× “Whether, under § 30-9-507, MCA, defendant was entitled to damages over and above the value of that deficiency has not been decided by the majority opinion and I, therefore, express no opinion on that issue.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 30-9-507(1) — 3 cases
Ottersen v. Rubick, 803 P.2d 1066 (Mont. 1990). “Section 30-9-507(1), MCA, provides an adequate remedy for sale of a minor portion of the collateral: If the disposition has occurred the debtor or any person entitled to notification or whose security interest has been made known to the secured party prior to the disposition has…”
Blaine Bank of Montana v. Haugen, 858 P.2d 14 (Mont. 1993). “When that factor is absent and only a minor portion of the collateral is sold improperly, § 30-9-507(1), MCA, provides an adequate remedy.”
Love v. United States, 844 F. Supp. 616 (D. Mont. 1994). “If the disposition has occurred the debtor or any person entitled to notification or whose security interest has been made known to the secured party prior to the disposition has a right to recover from the secured party any loss caused by failure to comply with the provisions…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 30-9-507(2) — 7 cases
Wippert v. Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian Reservation, 859 P.2d 420 (Mont. 1993). “The court concluded in its 1984 judgment that the sale of the Wipperts' cattle was commercially reasonable, under § 30-9-507(2), MCA, because the reasonableness of a sale depends on the manner in which the sale is conducted, not the price received; that the steps taken by the…”
Dulan v. Montana Nat. Bank of Roundup, 661 P.2d 28 (Mont. 1983). “Section 30-9-507(2), MCA. This Court interpreted these two sections of the UCC in the Talcott case, supra.”
Ottersen v. Rubick, 803 P.2d 1066 (Mont. 1990). “Section 30-9-507(1), MCA, provides an adequate remedy for sale of a minor portion of the collateral: If the disposition has occurred the debtor or any person entitled to notification or whose security interest has been made known to the secured party prior to the disposition has…”
Rose v. Myers, 724 P.2d 176 (Mont. 1986). “Section 30-9-507(2), MCA, states: The fact that a better price could have been obtained by a sale at a different time or in a different method from that selected by the secured party is not of itself sufficient to establish that the sale was not made in a commercially reasonable…”
Lilly v. Terwilliger, 796 P.2d 199 (Mont. 1990). “dictates that every aspect of the disposition of collateral, including the method, manner, time, place and terms must be commercially reasonable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.