40-5-128. Repealed. Sec. 58, Ch. 328, L. 1993.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 40-5-128 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 40. FAMILY LAW
CHAPTER 5. ENFORCEMENT OF SUPPORT
Part 1. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (Renumbered and Repealed)
Repealed
History: En. Sec. 27, Ch. 237, L. 1969; R.C.M. 1947, 93-2601-67.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1979–1988 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Dewyea v. Knapp, 674 P.2d 1104 (Mont. 1984).
State Ex Rel. Dewyea v. Knapp, 674 P.2d 1104 (Mont. 1984). “Violation of visitation rights of the noncustodial party play no part in a URESA action because Section 40-5-128, MCA, specifically precludes the use of such defenses.”
Borchers v. McCarter, 592 P.2d 941 (Mont. 1979). “1947, now section 40-5-128 MCA, provides: “If the obligor asserts as a defense that he is not the father of the child for whom support is sought and it appears to the court that the defense is not frivolous, and if both of the parties are present at the hearing or the proof…”
Sherburne Cnty. Soc. Sevices Ex Rel. Pouliot v. Kennedy, 426 N.W.2d 866 (Minn. 1988). “18 (1986); Mont.Code Ann. § 40-5-128 (1987). This court has indicated a preference for a URESA proceeding in cases where jurisdiction is challenged.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.