Notes of Decisions
Cited in
65
cases (
14 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case:
State v. Olivares-Coster, 2011 MT 196, 259 P.3d 760.
State v. Olivares-Coster, 2011 MT 196, 259 P.3d 760.
· cites it 64× “Moore's testimony was premised on § 46-23-201(4), MCA, which provides, "[a] prisoner serving a life sentence may not be paroled under this section until the prisoner has served 30 years.”
State v. Garrymore, 2006 MT 245, 145 P.3d 946.
· cites it 20× “He seeks to demonstrate that under the penalty statute, standing alone and without the operation of § 46-18-202(2), MCA, he was entitled to a parole-eligible sentence (subject to the requirements of the parole statute, § 46-23-201, MCA), which was then taken away from him by the…”
Crump v. Lafler, 657 F.3d 393 (6th Cir. 2011).
· cites it 12× “2415 (citing Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201 (1985)) (emphasis in original).”
Bd. of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 (1987).
· cites it 10× “" Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201 (1985) (emphasis added).”
McDermott v. McDonald, 2001 MT 89, 24 P.3d 200.
· cites it 10× “] Section 46-23-201, MCA (1985). The United States Supreme Court held that the mandatory language of this provision created a liberty interest in parole that is protected by the due process clause of the federal constitution.”
Sage v. Gamble, 929 P.2d 822 (Mont. 1996).
· cites it 24× “We conclude that the alleged deprivation of Sage's right to due process is directly related to whether the cause of his continued incarceration is or is not illegal, and therefore it falls within the parameters of § 46-22-101, MCA.”
State v. Holt, 2011 MT 42, 249 P.3d 470.
· cites it 12× “" Section 46-23-201(1), (5), MCA (emphases added).”
Gratzer v. Mahoney, 2006 MT 282, 150 P.3d 343.
· cites it 20× “” See § 46-23-201(1), MCA (1981) (providing that the parole board shall release certain prisoners on parole, “except .”
Worden v. Montana Bd. of Pardons & Parole, 1998 MT 168, 962 P.2d 1157.
· cites it 9× “Those Inmates who were serving sentences for crimes committed before the 1989 amendment of § 46-23-201, MCA (eligibility for parole) also claim that the Board of Pardons violated their, due process rights under the federal and Montana constitutions.”
Mcdermott v. Montana Dep't of Corr., 2001 MT 134, 29 P.3d 992.
· cites it 6× “" Section 46-23-201, MCA (1985). The Supreme Court concluded that, like the Nebraska statute in Greenholtz , *997 Montana's parole eligibility statute created a presumption that parole would be granted once the substantive predicates had been fulfilled.”
Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 2× “690 (parole eligibility); Mont.Code Ann. § 46-23-201 (parole eligibility); Neb.”
Vernon Kills on Top v. State, 2000 MT 340, 15 P.3d 422.
· cites it 6× “Section 46-23-201(1), MCA (1987), conditions parole on the parole board's determination that, "there is reasonable probability that the prisoner can be released without detriment to the prisoner or to the community...." Furthermore, subparagraph (2) of the same statute provides…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(1): 12 cases
Vernon Kills on Top v. State, 2000 MT 340, 15 P.3d 422.
“Section 46-23-201(1), MCA (1987), conditions parole on the parole board's determination that, "there is reasonable probability that the prisoner can be released without detriment to the prisoner or to the community...." Furthermore, subparagraph (2) of the same statute provides…”
Crump v. Lafler, 657 F.3d 393 (6th Cir. 2011).
“2415 (citing Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201 (1985)) (emphasis in original).”
State v. Holt, 2011 MT 42, 249 P.3d 470.
“" Section 46-23-201(1), (5), MCA (emphases added).”
State v. Garrymore, 2006 MT 245, 145 P.3d 946.
“He seeks to demonstrate that under the penalty statute, standing alone and without the operation of § 46-18-202(2), MCA, he was entitled to a parole-eligible sentence (subject to the requirements of the parole statute, § 46-23-201, MCA), which was then taken away from him by the…”
McDermott v. McDonald, 2001 MT 89, 24 P.3d 200.
“] Section 46-23-201, MCA (1985). The United States Supreme Court held that the mandatory language of this provision created a liberty interest in parole that is protected by the due process clause of the federal constitution.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(1)(a): 3 cases
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(2): 10 cases
Crump v. Lafler, 657 F.3d 393 (6th Cir. 2011).
“2415 (citing Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201 (1985)) (emphasis in original).”
State v. Holt, 2011 MT 42, 249 P.3d 470.
“" Section 46-23-201(1), (5), MCA (emphases added).”
McDermott v. McDonald, 2001 MT 89, 24 P.3d 200.
“] Section 46-23-201, MCA (1985). The United States Supreme Court held that the mandatory language of this provision created a liberty interest in parole that is protected by the due process clause of the federal constitution.”
State v. Garrymore, 2006 MT 245, 145 P.3d 946.
“He seeks to demonstrate that under the penalty statute, standing alone and without the operation of § 46-18-202(2), MCA, he was entitled to a parole-eligible sentence (subject to the requirements of the parole statute, § 46-23-201, MCA), which was then taken away from him by the…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(3): 3 cases
State v. Garrymore, 2006 MT 245, 145 P.3d 946.
“He seeks to demonstrate that under the penalty statute, standing alone and without the operation of § 46-18-202(2), MCA, he was entitled to a parole-eligible sentence (subject to the requirements of the parole statute, § 46-23-201, MCA), which was then taken away from him by the…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(4): 3 cases
State v. Olivares-Coster, 2011 MT 196, 259 P.3d 760.
“Moore's testimony was premised on § 46-23-201(4), MCA, which provides, "[a] prisoner serving a life sentence may not be paroled under this section until the prisoner has served 30 years.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(5): 1 case
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(6): 1 case
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(a): 1 case
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(l)(a): 3 cases
Gratzer v. Mahoney, 2006 MT 282, 150 P.3d 343.
“” See § 46-23-201(1), MCA (1981) (providing that the parole board shall release certain prisoners on parole, “except .”
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(l)(b): 1 case
Gratzer v. Mahoney, 2006 MT 282, 150 P.3d 343.
“” See § 46-23-201(1), MCA (1981) (providing that the parole board shall release certain prisoners on parole, “except .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.