61-8-202. Department of transportation to adopt manual. The department of transportation shall adopt a manual for a uniform system of traffic control devices consistent with this chapter for use upon highways within the state. The manual adopted by the department of transportation must correlate with and so far as possible conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as amended, published by the United States federal highway administration.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 61-8-202 (2026)
Department Of Transportation To Adopt Manual
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 61. MOTOR VEHICLES
CHAPTER 8. TRAFFIC REGULATION
Part 2. Traffic Control Devices
Department Of Transportation To Adopt Manual
History: En. Sec. 30, Ch. 263, L. 1955; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 241, L. 1959; amd. Sec. 52, Ch. 316, L. 1974; R.C.M. 1947, 32-2133; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 37, L. 1981; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 512, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 53, L. 2003.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1980–1992 · leading case: Brockie v. Omo Constr. Inc., 844 P.2d 61 (Mont. 1992).
Brockie v. Omo Constr. Inc., 844 P.2d 61 (Mont. 1992). “In 1981 the legislature amended Section 61-8-202, MCA, to clarify which traffic control manual the highway department should adopt.”
Runkle v. Burlington N., 613 P.2d 982 (Mont. 1980). “That contention arose in this way: Under section 61-8-202, MCA, the State Highway Department was required to adopt a manual and specifications for a uniform system of traffic control devices throughout the state.”
Wollaston v. Burlington N., Inc., 612 P.2d 1277 (Mont. 1980). “By virtue of section 61-8-202, MCA, the Montana State Highway Department was required to adopt a manual on specifications for a uniform system of traffic control devices throughout the state.”
Penn v. Burlington N., Inc., 605 P.2d 600 (Mont. 1980). “Penn maintains that in light of this statutory requirement, it is clear that the Manual has the force and effect of law.”
Mary Marshall, Individually & as Pers. Rep. v. Burlington N., Inc., 720 F.2d 1149 (9th Cir. 1983). “601 (1981), which also was adopted by Montana, see Mont.Code Ann. § 61-8-202 (1981). The manual prescribes that the selection of devices at grade crossings and the approval for federal funds is to be made by local agencies with jurisdiction over the crossing.”
Armijo v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 754 F. Supp. 1526 (D.N.M. 1990). “601 (1981), which also was adopted by Montana, see Mont.Code Ann. § 61-8-202 (1981). The manual prescribes that the selection of devices at grade crossings and the approval for federal funds is to be made by local agencies with jurisdiction over the crossing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.