Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-111 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

13-111.

Transferred to section 43-1411.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1956–2016 · leading case: Bryan M. v. Anne B., 874 N.W.2d 824 (Neb. 2016).
Bryan M. v. Anne B., 874 N.W.2d 824 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 5× “In reviewing the constitutionality of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-111 (Reissue 1977), the predecessor statute to § 43-1411, we held: The clear import of the language of § 13-111 is that the mother’s cause of action to establish the paternity of her child in order to recover her damages…”
State on Behalf of SM v. Oglesby, 510 N.W.2d 53 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 5× “In that case, we considered the constitutionality of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-111 (Reissue 1977). Section 13-111 is now § 43-1411, which is the statute at issue in this case.”
Shoecraft v. Catholic Soc. Servs. Bureau, Inc., 385 N.W.2d 448 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 4× “See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 13-111 (Reissue 1983). Even though the mother may determine not to relinquish the child for a period of 4 years and even though the father may acknowledge in writing, though not on the proper form, that he is the father, and even though he may provide…”
Farmer v. Farmer, 263 N.W.2d 664 (Neb. 1978). · cites it 8× “He also argues that since the child was born in 1970, and no paternity action had been brought against him within the time provided under section 13-111, R. R. S. 1943, that section 13-111, R.”
Carroll v. Moore, 423 N.W.2d 757 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “The state’s involvement on behalf of the plaintiff is obvious throughout the course of the proceedings.”
State v. Reuter, 343 N.W.2d 907 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 2× “His claim is that since he and his wife were not legally married, his children were born out of lawful wedlock, and since no paternity action was brought within 4 years of the children’s births, as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-111 (Reissue 1977), his obligation is a moral…”
Doak v. Milbauer, 343 N.W.2d 751 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 3× “The pertinent statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-111 (Reissue 1977), reads as follows: “A civil proceeding to establish the paternity of a child may be instituted *333 in any district court of the district where the child is domiciled or found, by the mother of such child, either…”
State Ex Rel. B.A.T. v. S.K.D., 522 N.W.2d 393 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-111 (Reissue 1977), the predecessor to § 43-1411, provided in part that the action might be brought by the mother “within four years after its [the child’s] birth, or by the guardian [ad litem] or next friend of such child.”
State Ex Rel. Bauersachs v. Williams, 340 N.W.2d 431 (Neb. 1983). “Williams moved for dismissal of the proceedings “for lack of venue,” and directed the court’s attention to § 13-111, “A civil proceeding to establish the paternity of a child may be instituted in any district court of the district where the child is domiciled or found .”
Cnty. of Hall v. McDermott, 284 N.W.2d 287 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 2× “1943, which provides: “A civil proceeding to establish the paternity of a child may be instituted in any district court of the district where the child is domiciled or found, by the mother of such child, either during pregnancy or within four years after its birth, or by the…”
Lockman v. Fulton, 76 N.W.2d 452 (Neb. 1956). “Complainant, Delores Ann Lockman, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought this filiation proceeding against defendant, Robert Fulton, under the provisions of sections 13-111 and 13-112, R. R. S. 1943, seeking an adjudication that defendant was the father of her unborn child as…”
Cnty. of Hall Ex Rel. Wisely v. McDermott, 284 N.W.2d 287 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 2× “1943, which provides: "A civil proceeding to establish the paternity of a child may be instituted in any district court of the district where the child is domiciled or found, by the mother of such child, either during pregnancy or within four years after its birth, or by the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.