(1) Regulations adopted pursuant to sections 14-401 to 14-418 shall comply with the Municipal Density and Missing Middle Housing Act and be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to (a) lessen congestion in the streets, (b) secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, (c) promote health and the general welfare, (d) provide adequate light and air, (e) prevent the overcrowding of land, (f) secure safety from flood, (g) avoid undue concentration of population, (h) facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements, and (i) promote convenience of access.
(2) Such regulations shall be made with reasonable consideration, among other things, as to the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the city. Whenever the city council shall determine that the use or contemplated use of any building, structure, or land will cause congestion in the streets, increase the danger from fire or panic, imperil public safety, cause undue concentration or congregation of people, or impede transportation, the city council may include in such regulations requirements for alleviating or preventing such conditions when any change in use or zoning classification is requested by the owner.
Notes of Decisions
Giger v. City of Omaha, 442 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 1989).
· cites it 9× “Further, § 14-403 in part provides: Whenever the City council shall determine that the use or contemplated use of any building, structure or land will cause congestion in the streets, increase danger from fire or panic, imperil public safety, cause undue concentration or…”
Sasich v. City of Omaha, 347 N.W.2d 93 (Neb. 1984).
· cites it 9× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-403 (Reissue 1977) provides: ‘‘Such regulations shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; to promote health and the general welfare; to provide…”
Bucholz v. City of Omaha, 120 N.W.2d 270 (Neb. 1963).
· cites it 3× “” § 14-403, R. R. S. 1943. The plaintiffs make a number of contentions based upon the requirements of section 14-403, R.”
Wolf v. City of Omaha, 129 N.W.2d 501 (Neb. 1964).
· cites it 2× “” Section 14-403, R. R. S. 1943, provides: “Such regulations shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; to promote health and the general welfare; to provide…”
Eastroads, Inc. v. City of Omaha, 467 N.W.2d 888 (Neb. 1991).
· cites it 2× “§ 14-403 (Reissue 1987) sets forth the elements considered in rezoning: Such regulations shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; to promote health and the general…”
Sanitary & Improvement Dist. No. 347 v. City of Omaha, 589 N.W.2d 160 (Neb. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 3× “Considering Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-403 (Reissue 1997), the proposed rezoning is not designed to lessen congestion and will *84 have the opposite effect, nor will it promote convenience of access.”
Roncka v. Fogarty, 41 N.W.2d 745 (Neb. 1950).
· cites it 2× “Section 14-403 provides that such regulations shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan designed to lessen congestion in the streets.”
Davis v. City of Omaha, 45 N.W.2d 172 (Neb. 1950).
· cites it 5× “” § 14-403, R. S. 1943. The first zoning ordinance was adopted in 1920.”
Agrex, Inc. v. City of Superior, 581 N.W.2d 428 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 2× “The owners alleged that their property was located in the East Park Industrial Subdivision (Park), which was created as an industrial area by the City in 1977 pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-403 (Reissue 1997) and an ordinance of the City, and that the City could not annex…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.