Any person who has filed a written complaint before the board of equalization pursuant to section 14-547 shall have the right to appeal to the district court of the county within which such city of the metropolitan class is located, by filing a good and sufficient bond in the sum of not less than fifty dollars and not more than double the amount of the assessment complained of, conditioned for the faithful prosecution of such appeal, and if the judgment of special assessment is sustained, to pay the amount of such judgment, interest, and costs. Such bond shall be approved and appeal taken as specified in section 14-813. The district court shall hear the appeal as in equity and without a jury and determine anew all questions raised before the city. If the court finds such assessment to be valid, it shall render a decree for the amount of the assessment, interest, and costs, and declare such assessment, interest, and costs a lien upon the lots or lands so assessed. If the court finds that the tax is invalid it shall order a relevy of such assessment or enter such decree as may be just and equitable.
Notes of Decisions
Glasson v. Bd. of Equal. of City of Omaha, 302 Neb. 869 (Neb. 2019).
· cites it 2× “The court further noted that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-548 (Reissue 2012) gives a property owner, aggrieved by an assessment ordinance, the right to appeal the decision to the district court, and indicated that § 14-547 equates an ordinance to a final order.”
Jackson v. Bd. of Equalization, 630 N.W.2d 680 (Neb. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-548 (Reissue 1997) provides an aggrieved property owner the right to appeal the City’s special assessment to the district court, and the appeal is “taken as specified in section 14-813.”
RGR Co. v. Lincoln Comm'n on Human Rights, 873 N.W.2d 881 (Neb. 2016).
· cites it 2× “Thus, in Jackson, the Nebraska Court of Appeals observed that given the statutory framework, the standard of review applicable to an appeal of a city council’s special assessment to the district court differed according to whether the city is of the “‘metropolitan class’” or…”
Cnty. of Red Willow v. City of McCook, 499 N.W.2d 531 (Neb. 1993).
· cites it 3× “MIC Enterprises did not contest the assessment, either in compliance with Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 14-548 and 14-813 (Reissue 1991) or otherwise.”
Glasson v. Bd. of Equal. of City of Omaha, 302 Neb. 869 (Neb. 2019).
· cites it 2× “The court further noted that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-548 (Reissue 2012) gives a property owner, aggrieved by an assessment ordinance, the right to appeal the decision to the district court, and indicated that § 14-547 equates an ordinance to a final order.”
Glasson v. Bd. of Equal. of City of Omaha, 302 Neb. 869 (Neb. 2019).
· cites it 2× “The court further noted that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-548 (Reissue 2012) gives a property owner, aggrieved by an assessment ordinance, the right to appeal the decision to the district court, and indicated that § 14-547 equates an ordinance to a final order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.