Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1913 (2026)

Appealed causes; parties; how designated

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The cause shall be docketed in the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court under the same title it had in the district court. The party or parties asking for the reversal, vacation, or modification of such judgment, decree, or final order shall be designated as appellant or appellants, and the adverse party or parties shall be designated as appellee or appellees.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1949–2025 · leading case: In re Interest of Steven S., 27 Neb. Ct. App. 831 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Interest of Steven S., 27 Neb. Ct. App. 831 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “Interestingly, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1913 (Reissue 2016) pro- vides that the party asking for reversal, vacation, or modifica- tion of a final order is to be designated as appellant, and the adverse party is to be designated as appellee.”
In Re Interest of Natasha H., 602 N.W.2d 439 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 2× “The party or parties asking for the reversal, vacation, or modification of such judgment, decree, or final order shall be designated as appellant or appellants, and the adverse party or parties shall be designated as appellee or appellees.”
Kirchner v. Gast, 100 N.W.2d 65 (Neb. 1959). · cites it 2× “Under these circumstances the District becomes an appellee under the provisions of section 25-1913, R. R. S. 1943, with the right to cross-appeal here under the provisions of rule 1 d.”
Sec. Inv. Co. v. Golz, 36 N.W.2d 862 (Neb. 1949). · cites it 2× “Section 25-1913, R. S. 1943, provides that a cause shall be docketed in the Supreme Court under the same title it had in the district court, that the party or parties asking the reversal, vacation, or modification of such judgment, decree, or final order shall be designated as…”
In re Interest of Treasean J. (Neb. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1913 (Reissue 2016).”
In re Interest of Harley W. & Jaxen W. (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “In this case, James’ brief takes the same form as an appellant’s brief, he is seeking reversal of a final order, his interests are not adverse to those of Tabitha, and as defined by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1913 (Reissue 2016), he is an appellant.”
In re Interest of Dawson B. (Neb. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “As defined by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1913 (Reissue 2016), he is more akin to an appellant than an appellee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.