Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2610 (2026)

Change of award by arbitrators

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

On application of a party or, if an application to the court is pending under section 25-2612, 25-2613, or 25-2614, on submission to the arbitrators by the court under such conditions as the court may order, the arbitrators may modify or correct the award upon the grounds stated in subdivisions (a)(1) and (a)(3) of section 25-2614 or for the purpose of clarifying the award. The application shall be made within twenty days after delivery of the award to the applicant. Written notice thereof shall be given forthwith to the opposing party, stating he or she must serve his or her objections thereto, if any, within ten days from the notice. The award so modified or corrected is subject to the provisions of sections 25-2612 to 25-2614.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2001–2023 · leading case: Jones v. Summit Ltd. P'ship Five, 635 N.W.2d 267 (Neb. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jones v. Summit Ltd. P'ship Five, 635 N.W.2d 267 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 2× “That same day, The Summit Group filed an application for modification of the award with the arbitrator in accordance with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2610 (Reissue 1995).”
Hartman v. City of Grand Island, 657 N.W.2d 641 (Neb. 2003). “” Second, § 25-2610 provides that the arbitrators may modify or correct an award imperfect in a matter of form upon application of a party “made within twenty days after delivery of the award to the applicant.”
Signal 88 v. Lyconic, 29 Neb. Ct. App. 533 (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 5× “Although not argued by either party in its brief, we sepa- rately note the language in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2610 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Nebraska Assn. of Pub. Employees, 984 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 6× “” 33 Although contract provisions agreed to by the parties control over contrary provisions of the NUAA, 34 in the absence of a contrary contract provision, the provisions of the NUAA control.”
Signal 88 v. Lyconic, 310 Neb. 824 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 5× “” Signal 88 argued the court “has the power to remand under [ Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2610 (Reissue 2016)].”
Signal 88 v. Lyconic, 310 Neb. 824 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 5× “” Signal 88 argued the court “has the power to remand under [ Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2610 (Reissue 2016)].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.